<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dude, Certification Isn&#8217;t Preinstallation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/#comment-386</guid>
		<description>In my humble opinion, when there&#039;s such a deadlock on the market, industry watchdogs need to intervene. Take this other recent story from Bob Cringely as an example:

http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2007/02/microsoft_dirty_tric_4.html

Microsoft dirty tricks, part two
&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2007/02/microsoft_dirty_tric_4.html&quot;&gt;
&quot;So the outside vendor was Hewlett-Packard, one of Microsoft&#039;s hardware OEMs, which is to say Microsoft&#039;s bitch.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Monopolies are known to be the cause for poor support and high prices. Kickbacks/favours such as these are good for nobody. Except those who keep themselves inside the &#039;circle&#039;. The worry here is that Novell wishes to enter this circle of friends, which act selfishly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my humble opinion, when there&#8217;s such a deadlock on the market, industry watchdogs need to intervene. Take this other recent story from Bob Cringely as an example:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2007/02/microsoft_dirty_tric_4.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2007/02/microsoft_dirty_tric_4.html</a></p>
<p>Microsoft dirty tricks, part two</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.technologyevangelist.com/2007/02/microsoft_dirty_tric_4.html"><p>
&#8220;So the outside vendor was Hewlett-Packard, one of Microsoft&#8217;s hardware OEMs, which is to say Microsoft&#8217;s bitch.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Monopolies are known to be the cause for poor support and high prices. Kickbacks/favours such as these are good for nobody. Except those who keep themselves inside the &#8216;circle&#8217;. The worry here is that Novell wishes to enter this circle of friends, which act selfishly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draconishinobi</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Draconishinobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Yeah, well, so what can you do ? Really, all companies out there strive for maximum profit. M$ can produce a big dip in the profit margins of any extant computer company. So, they all play along. So, I ask, where&#039;s the ethics in that ? (on both sides)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well, so what can you do ? Really, all companies out there strive for maximum profit. M$ can produce a big dip in the profit margins of any extant computer company. So, they all play along. So, I ask, where&#8217;s the ethics in that ? (on both sides)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/02/27/dude-certification-isnt-preinstallation/#comment-384</guid>
		<description>It is amazing how many people fell for this PR stunt. Dell remains loyal to (or afraid of) Microsoft. It happens every time.

Did Microsoft want to &#039;whack&#039; Dell over its Linux dealings?
http://news.com.com/Did+Microsoft+want+to+whack+Dell+over+its+Linux+dealings/2100-1014_3-6153904.html

Dell&#039;s secret Linux fling [sabotaged by Microsoft]
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/09/dell_linux_china/

Microsoft &#039;killed Dell Linux&#039; - States
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/03/19/microsoft_killed_dell_linux_states/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is amazing how many people fell for this PR stunt. Dell remains loyal to (or afraid of) Microsoft. It happens every time.</p>
<p>Did Microsoft want to &#8216;whack&#8217; Dell over its Linux dealings?<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/Did+Microsoft+want+to+whack+Dell+over+its+Linux+dealings/2100-1014_3-6153904.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Did+Microsoft+want+to+whack+Dell+over+its+Linux+dealings/2100-1014_3-6153904.html</a></p>
<p>Dell&#8217;s secret Linux fling [sabotaged by Microsoft]<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/09/dell_linux_china/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/09/dell_linux_china/</a></p>
<p>Microsoft &#8216;killed Dell Linux&#8217; &#8211; States<br />
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/03/19/microsoft_killed_dell_linux_states/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2002/03/19/microsoft_killed_dell_linux_states/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

