04.10.07

Novell: Really, We Don’t Have a Patent Cross-License

Posted in Intellectual Monopoly, Microsoft, Novell at 4:11 pm by Shane Coyle

Unless you’re using the definition explicitly included in GPLv3, anyhow.

Bruce Lowry has posted an update on the Novell PR Blog regarding the furor over OpenSUSE and the disabling of Cleartype.

In this specific case, the ClearType font is supplied as part of the freetype2 package; last summer the upstream maintainer changed the package’s default settings to disable Clear Type and thereby avoid possibly relevant Microsoft patents. So, consistent with Novell’s preexisting practices and current policy, Novell is using the default settings established by the upstream maintainer. Distributions such as Fedora made the same choice. This issue only came up in the summer of 2006 and therefore older distributions are using the previous default (enabled ClearType).

We hope this clears up any confusion over the issue.

So, here is a clear indication that Novell indeed does not have a patent cross-license, but rather – as they have stated all along (and is their loophole in GPLv2) they have agreed to pay Microsoft a running royalty on open-source software shipped under the agreement for a promise from them not to sue Novell’s customers over unspecified potential IP infringement.

I still say it isn’t GPLv2 compliant.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Permalink Mail Send this to a friend

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

3 Comments

Stephen Holmes said,

April 10, 2007 at 5:33 pm

Then technically you’d be wrong and should probably reclarify your last remark to say that perhaps it’s not in the spirit of the license (not wanting to put words in your mouth) . If there’s a patent violation of MS’s in lLinux’s font handling code, then it’s right to disable it in upstream for all distributions that consume it.
shane said,

April 10, 2007 at 5:51 pm

should probably reclarify your last remark to say that that perhaps it’s not in the spirit of the license

I have made that characterization as well, even in the linked article:

By entering into this deal with MS, Novell is in effect limiting recipient’s rights to redistribute GPL’ed code using MS as a proxy. As I have said before, whether or not Novell is violating the letter of the GPL, it is certainly violating its spirit.

But, the GPLv2 preamble clearly defines the purpose and intent of the license:

Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any patent must be licensed for everyone’s free use or not licensed at all.

By making this discriminatory patent deal in which Microsoft has agreed to not enforce their patent rights for a royalty payment, I believe Novell is not complying with the license’s intent.
Roy Schestowitz said,

April 11, 2007 at 7:42 am

I quite liked the funny criticism in the source of our original post. In reference to Bruce’s rebuttal:

Not quite. I mean, thanks for the consistency, but please, could you have somebody who knows what everything is about to rewrite the post? There isn’t anything like a ClearType font, but a sub-pixel hinting algorithm for any displayed fonts!

What Else is New

Links 9/12/2019: Linux 5.5 RC1, EasyOS Buster 2.1.9

Links for the day
IRC Proceedings: Sunday, December 08, 2019

IRC logs for Sunday, December 08, 2019
Mandatory Education for Those Who Use and Misuse Buzzwords Would Go a Long Way

In an age of substitution — where marketing terms replace meaningful words and concepts — it has gotten more difficult to have honest debates, for example about the scope of patents
Once Upon a Time Banter Was Allowed on Mailing Lists

Hours ago Torvalds announced RC1 of the next Linux (kernel) release; it has been a while since he last said something ‘controversial’ (following his month at the penalty box); free speech deficit can make us weaker, not stronger (advantage to those who work in the dark)
Links 8/12/2019: Debian Init Systems GR, NomadBSD 1.3

Links for the day
Can We Quit Celebrating DRM in GNU/Linux?

Over the past couple of days various news sites and "Linux" sites expressed great satisfaction [1-5] over the passive embrace of Disney's DRM ploy (Disney+), even when Disney itself rejects DRM, seeing the harms practically caused by it [6,7]
You Know WSL is Bad for GNU/Linux Because Anti-Linux People, Microsoft and Its Propagandists, Want People to Use That

Microsoft and its boosters (and media partners) haven’t grown tired of spreading falsehoods to stigmatise and take control of GNU/Linux by creating their own versions and traps for it
IRC Proceedings: Saturday, December 07, 2019

IRC logs for Saturday, December 07, 2019
5 Years Ago the Linux Foundation Turned Linux.com Into a Non-Linux Site

One can leverage the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine to better understand how, over time, the Foundation called “Linux” deviated or diverged away from its mission statement for the sole purpose of raising corporate funds and selling influence to corporations (passing the community’s hard work to them — a form of tacit privatisation)
Microsoft Redefining Ownership and Identity of GNU/Linux

The idea that “Microsoft loves Linux” is as insane as it gets; but the lie which is “Microsoft loves Linux” is a powerful enabler of Microsoft entryism, e.g. if Greg steps down, does a Microsoft employee become the deputy of Linus Torvalds?
Things That Cannot Be Said

The limits on what we can say are mostly defined by what sources permit us to say publicly (for the sake of source protection)
Fake European Patents (on Algorithms) Leading to Fake Embargoes

Law firms have gotten their way in Germany; instead of supporting the productive workers the patent system is nowadays promoting the litigation 'industry' and it ought to be corrected
From Moderate Advice to FUD and Misinformation: The Case of a VPN Vulnerability (CVE-2019-14899)

What should have been a trivial bugfix in a variety of operating systems and bits of software — both proprietary and Free software — somehow became anti-Linux FUD, clickbait and worse
Dangerous Thinker

Society oughtn't be alarmed by people who say unusual things; it should be wary and sceptical of those corporations ever so eager to silence such people
Unitary Patent (UPC) Died Along With the Credibility of Managing IP and the Rest of the UPC Lobby

It is pretty astounding that Team UPC (collective term for people who crafted and lobby for this illegal construct) is still telling us lies, even in the absence of underlying supportive facts, and pressure groups disguised as "news sites" latch onto anything to perpetuate an illusion of progress (even in the face of a growing number of major barriers)
IRC Proceedings: Friday, December 06, 2019

IRC logs for Friday, December 06, 2019
Links 7/12/2019: Fedora 31 Elections Results, Lots of Media Drama Over VPN Bug

Links for the day
Links 6/12/2019: DRM in GNU/Linux and Sparky Bonsai

Links for the day
The EPO Rejects Innovation

The EPO ceased caring about the needs of scientists whose work involves invention; instead, EPO management crafts increasingly lenient guidelines that yield illegal European Patents (not compatible with the EPC) that heavily-besieged EPO judges are unable to stop
Startpage CEO Robert Beens in 'Damage Control' Mode, Trying to Get Startpage Relisted After Selling to a Massive Surveillance Company

PrivacytoolsIO is being lobbied by the CEO of Startpage to relist Startpage, based on no actual refutations at all
IRC Proceedings: Thursday, December 05, 2019

IRC logs for Thursday, December 05, 2019
Links 5/12/2019: qBittorrent 4.2.0, Expensive Librem 5 and OpenBSD Bugs

Links for the day
Microsoft Staff Repeatedly Refuses to Tell How Many People Use WSL, Defends Patent Extortion and Blackmail of Linux Instead

The people who develop WSL (mostly Microsoft employees) get easily irritated when asked how many people actually use this thing; but more interestingly, however, they reveal their disdain for GNU/Linux and support for Microsoft blackmail (for 'Linux patent tax')
IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, December 04, 2019

IRC logs for Wednesday, December 04, 2019
Links 4/12/2019: Tails 4.1, UCS 4.4-3 and Proxmox VE 6.1

Links for the day
Google Tightens Its Noose

Now it’s official! Google is just a bunch of shareholders looking to appease the Pentagon at all costs
Europeans Still Need to Save the European Patent Office From Those Who Attack Its Patent Quality

Patent quality is of utmost interest; without it, as we're seeing at the EPO and have already seen at the USPTO for a number of years, legal disputes will arise where neither side wins (only the lawyers win) and small, impoverished inventors or businesses will be forced to settle outside the courts over baseless allegations, often made by parasitic patent trolls (possessing low-quality patents they don't want scrutinised by courts)
We Never Accepted and Will Never Accept Corporate Money

Corporate money is a unique problem because of its magnitude and the fact that it's impersonal; shareholders can only ever accept its supposed justifications if they're receiving something in return (of proportional worth to the payment/transaction)
IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, December 03, 2019

IRC logs for Tuesday, December 03, 2019
Links 3/12/2019: elementary OS 5.1 Hera, Plasma 5.17.4, Firefox 71

Links for the day