SCO an Active Litigious Proxy, Novell a Passive Litigious Proxy

Posted in FUD, Microsoft, Novell, Patents at 10:32 pm by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Dana Gardner explains (without any shyness, I must add) that Microsoft used SCO as a convenient proxy to do its dirty litigious work. There have been some similar examples in the past, but some are too speculative. Dana opines that, due to desperation, the company has simply moved on to a military state-esque approach, which will inevitably fail miserably.

It’s a recurring argument. We have seen articles that mention Saddam Hussein, equate that to “Corporate Terrorism”, or use eye-catching headlines such as “Convicted Monopolist Terrorizes Software Industry“. The approach used here can be assimilated to the approach taken by vicious rulers that take advantage of fear, which is the strongest motivator/driver known to any human being.

The latest moves by Microsoft, however, give them away. Stripped of their proxies, their moves are now more clearly understood to be essentially military. You are the civilians caught between Microsoft’s lawyers and their quarry.


If there was ever a case for open source software, dear readers, this is it.

This is clearly an act of desperation, yet an act from a perceived position of immutable power. Having worked with animals, I can tell you these can be truly dangerous circumstances.

Since we have our eyes on Novell in this Web site, the following new item is worth watching as well. Novell not only enjoys and benefits from the latest friction, but passively it is also used as a weapon against Linux.

According to Microsoft, “The real question is not whether there exists substantial patent infringement issues, but what to do about them.” Its immediate solution is for “any customer that is concerned about Linux IP issues…to obtain their open source subscriptions from Novell.”


Fortune says that “Microsoft had hoped that the Novell deal would become a model it could use to collect patent royalties from other distributors of free software. In that respect, its ‘bridge’ to the free world appears to have failed. That, in turn, seems to have taken us a step closer to patent Armageddon. ‘The only real solution that [the free software] folks have to offer,’ Smith told Fortune, ‘is that they first burn down the bridge, and then they burn down the patent system. That to me is not a goal that’s likely to be achieved, and not a goal that should be achieved.’”


If the next version of the GPL blocks Microsoft from collecting royalties from the distributions then it’s back to collecting from major Linux users. Parloff asked Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer if he’s prepared to sue his own users à la SCO and the record industry.

The act of collecting royalties, which is something that is already happening, is akin to actions taken by the RIAA. These can be perceived as settlements out of the court, and they will clearly lead to backlash. Unlike pirated music and innocent poor students, here you have legitimate software, wealthy businesses, and a desperate monopoly abuser.

The music industry suffered a 40% drop in just one year. Microsoft could be going down the same aisle if it resorts to extortion (royalties) and/or litigation.

Calls to Have Patents Pertaining to Software Abolished

Posted in Free/Libre Software, Novell, Patents at 8:39 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

It has become clear that what is needed are less patents, not more patents. Some are suggesting total elimination of particular types of patents while others might be trying to extend their scope.

It has also become clear that everyone is a sufferer and a protester, even some large companies, not just small ones. Entire economies may be at stake.

A CEO which (at least in part) considers himself a partner of Microsoft has said the following in an InformationWeek interview:

…we don’t believe in patents. We believe they are tools to stop innovation. Our position is patent law should be rewritten as it pertains to software.

Here is another new little piece:

Simple solution; burn down the patent office, rebuild it, adopt the doctrine that all software source code must be disclosed. If someone violates on of your patents, you get to violate on of theirs. Fair enough?

Earlier today we used video footage to illustrate the fact that the patent system had gone insane, with about 20,000 (potentially trivial) patents pertaining to wicking alone.

Novell has entered dangerous territories and it should reconsider its pact, or at least consider lobbying for the abolishment of software patents. It would then be perceived as a contributer rather than a nuisance to Free software developers. At the moment, we believe that it silently or resistantly sidles with the attacks on Linux, which serve it well.

Video: Victim of Patent Trolling

Posted in Patents, Videos at 1:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources




Samba logo

We support

End software patents


GNU project


EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com

Recent Posts