<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mystifying Words from Red Hat&#8217;s CEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/comment-page-1/#comment-1094</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/#comment-1094</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarifications.  The eye-catching headline and the following part of the sentence led me to far-fetched speculations.

&quot;&lt;em&gt;...hasn’t moved and it’s been the same for as long as I’ve been at Red Hat&lt;/em&gt;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarifications.  The eye-catching headline and the following part of the sentence led me to far-fetched speculations.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>&#8230;hasn’t moved and it’s been the same for as long as I’ve been at Red Hat</em>&#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kripken</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>kripken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 18:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>As I follow the Red Hat announcements, it seems pretty obvious what they are getting at (as I see things, at least). 

Basically Red Hat are a for-profit corporation, with FOSS ideals at heart. Because of those ideals, they won&#039;t sign a vague &#039;patent covenant&#039; like Novell did. Yet, if Microsoft shows the actual patents publicly, and they are found to be a serious issue, Red Hat will have no choice but to arrive at a deal (or, barring some technical workaround, stop doing business in the US).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I follow the Red Hat announcements, it seems pretty obvious what they are getting at (as I see things, at least). </p>
<p>Basically Red Hat are a for-profit corporation, with FOSS ideals at heart. Because of those ideals, they won&#8217;t sign a vague &#8216;patent covenant&#8217; like Novell did. Yet, if Microsoft shows the actual patents publicly, and they are found to be a serious issue, Red Hat will have no choice but to arrive at a deal (or, barring some technical workaround, stop doing business in the US).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shane coyle</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>shane coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Yeah, and he specifically says &#039;around standards&#039;, which is in line with their &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/05/09/interoperability-shouldnt-require-an-agreement/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;previously espoused stance on interoperability&lt;/a&gt; as well.

Probably nothing to worry about, Novell had serious financial problems when MS knocked on their door, Red Hat&#039;s business is soaring - why alienate their developers for a less-than-useless patent pledge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, and he specifically says &#8216;around standards&#8217;, which is in line with their <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/05/09/interoperability-shouldnt-require-an-agreement/" rel="nofollow">previously espoused stance on interoperability</a> as well.</p>
<p>Probably nothing to worry about, Novell had serious financial problems when MS knocked on their door, Red Hat&#8217;s business is soaring &#8211; why alienate their developers for a less-than-useless patent pledge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Drinkwater</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/comment-page-1/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>John Drinkwater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/06/29/red-hat-quote-subtle/#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>IMHO: His quote backs up Red Hat&#039;s stance, maybe it&#039;s just a poor choice of words, due to it being targetted at investors.

The important quote: &quot;…to participate with Microsoft around standards and about improving the customer relationship and experience of being able to operate successfully within a &lt;b&gt;heterogeneous&lt;/b&gt; environment,&quot; is everything RH has been saying all along.

And on patents: &quot;Our position hasn’t moved and it’s been the same for as long as I’ve been at Red Hat.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO: His quote backs up Red Hat&#8217;s stance, maybe it&#8217;s just a poor choice of words, due to it being targetted at investors.</p>
<p>The important quote: &#8220;…to participate with Microsoft around standards and about improving the customer relationship and experience of being able to operate successfully within a <b>heterogeneous</b> environment,&#8221; is everything RH has been saying all along.</p>
<p>And on patents: &#8220;Our position hasn’t moved and it’s been the same for as long as I’ve been at Red Hat.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

