<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novell, AppArmor, and the Linux Kernel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2007/07/04/linux-apparmor-suse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2007/07/04/linux-apparmor-suse/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpl1</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/07/04/linux-apparmor-suse/comment-page-1/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>gpl1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/04/linux-apparmor-suse/#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>AppArmor apparently has some very big flaws, like symbolic links and paths.  I&#039;m not sure why they think SELinux is so hard since Fedora 7 and Red Hat 5 deals with it very nicely out of the box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AppArmor apparently has some very big flaws, like symbolic links and paths.  I&#8217;m not sure why they think SELinux is so hard since Fedora 7 and Red Hat 5 deals with it very nicely out of the box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

