Comments on: Novell Identifies Microsoft-GPLv3-FSF Workaround (Updated) http://techrights.org/2007/07/10/novell-workaround/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2007/07/10/novell-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-1202 Roy Schestowitz Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:13:44 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/10/novell-workaround/#comment-1202 That's exactly what I wondered myself. In a different forum we are currently discussing the licences because of the issue of 'inheriting' licenses cannot be ignored. Maybe I'll post a link to this thread later on. That’s exactly what I wondered myself. In a different forum we are currently discussing the licences because of the issue of ‘inheriting’ licenses cannot be ignored. Maybe I’ll post a link to this thread later on.

]]> By: Shane Coyle http://techrights.org/2007/07/10/novell-workaround/comment-page-1/#comment-1199 Shane Coyle Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:16:09 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/10/novell-workaround/#comment-1199 <blockquote> In an e-mail Monday, Novell’s spokesman said the company would fill the gap by distributing portions of its SUSE Linux enterprise suite that fall under the GPLv3 license directly to customers who purchased certificates that would have entitled them to receive the software from Microsoft. </blockquote> Anyone still arguing that Microsoft isn't distributing GPLv2 software?

In an e-mail Monday, Novell’s spokesman said the company would fill the gap by distributing portions of its SUSE Linux enterprise suite that fall under the GPLv3 license directly to customers who purchased certificates that would have entitled them to receive the software from Microsoft.

Anyone still arguing that Microsoft isn’t distributing GPLv2 software?

]]>