<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Brings IP FUD into OSI, Deters Adopters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2007/07/31/osi-ip-fud-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2007/07/31/osi-ip-fud-plan/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/07/31/osi-ip-fud-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/31/osi-ip-fud-plan/#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Yes, you&#039;re right, Stephen. I wasn&#039;t suggesting that Novell might/should stop filing patents, but do remember that they have a certain responsibility and commitment after they sidled with EFF at OSBC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#8217;re right, Stephen. I wasn&#8217;t suggesting that Novell might/should stop filing patents, but do remember that they have a certain responsibility and commitment after they sidled with EFF at OSBC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/07/31/osi-ip-fud-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 08:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/31/osi-ip-fud-plan/#comment-1524</guid>
		<description>But of course Novell will continue to  file patents - it&#039;s a mixed-source company - it has to.  Until the joke that is the US patent system is &quot;fixed&quot;, any company with innovative technologies will continue to file for patents.  It has already said it would do so and that it would use it&#039;s patent arsenal defensively.  

The link you&#039;ve provided hardly shows a huge activity either - there was just one patent for Novell in 2001.

Also, Redhat do exactly the same thing and have done for a long time.  See http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-05-26-002-26-PS-RH-LL and more recently http://www.managingip.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677230 (subscription required)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of course Novell will continue to  file patents &#8211; it&#8217;s a mixed-source company &#8211; it has to.  Until the joke that is the US patent system is &#8220;fixed&#8221;, any company with innovative technologies will continue to file for patents.  It has already said it would do so and that it would use it&#8217;s patent arsenal defensively.  </p>
<p>The link you&#8217;ve provided hardly shows a huge activity either &#8211; there was just one patent for Novell in 2001.</p>
<p>Also, Redhat do exactly the same thing and have done for a long time.  See <a href="http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-05-26-002-26-PS-RH-LL" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2002-05-26-002-26-PS-RH-LL</a> and more recently <a href="http://www.managingip.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677230" rel="nofollow">http://www.managingip.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=677230</a> (subscription required)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

