<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anatomy of Invade-to-Subvert Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 20:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>In some cases, volunteers programmers were fooled as well. A good example is Xen (or soI was told).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some cases, volunteers programmers were fooled as well. A good example is Xen (or soI was told).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Hiser</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>Roy-

Consider this. If these &quot;projects&quot; and companies -- often run by ex-Microsofties or Sunnies -- were ever open source (doubtful in itself) then they are no longer. They&#039;ve given up one underrated criteria for authentic open source status: autonomy.

I would say it&#039;s about a zero give-up, apart from the fact that the investors and customers were fooled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy-</p>
<p>Consider this. If these &#8220;projects&#8221; and companies &#8212; often run by ex-Microsofties or Sunnies &#8212; were ever open source (doubtful in itself) then they are no longer. They&#8217;ve given up one underrated criteria for authentic open source status: autonomy.</p>
<p>I would say it&#8217;s about a zero give-up, apart from the fact that the investors and customers were fooled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Hiser</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-1627</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Hiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 15:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/08/04/invade-to-subvert-strategies/#comment-1627</guid>
		<description>Invasion of the Bodysnatcher.

It&#039;s ambition is total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invasion of the Bodysnatcher.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ambition is total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

