Comments on: Mono: the Warning is Here, the Timebomb is Near http://techrights.org/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2243 Roy Schestowitz Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:46:47 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/#comment-2243 This is not about visibility of the code, but also about patents and other related issues that we covered in the past. This is not about visibility of the code, but also about patents and other related issues that we covered in the past.

]]> By: Chakkaradeep http://techrights.org/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/comment-page-1/#comment-2242 Chakkaradeep Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:00:03 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/04/mono-timebomb/#comment-2242 Hi Roy, Please note that during the days of Visual Studio 6.0, Visual C++ 6.0 (MFC/WTL/ATL) programming, Microsoft had the source code be able to be viewed and installed along with Visual Studio for debugging purposes which has helped us developers a lot and we are happy that they are doing the same thing again.The eWeek article is totally unacceptable. Now we just hear Anti-Microsoft campaign with SJVN unlike analyzing facts like your website. Hi Roy,

Please note that during the days of Visual Studio 6.0, Visual C++ 6.0 (MFC/WTL/ATL) programming, Microsoft had the source code be able to be viewed and installed along with Visual Studio for debugging purposes which has helped us developers a lot and we are happy that they are doing the same thing again.The eWeek article is totally unacceptable. Now we just hear Anti-Microsoft campaign with SJVN unlike analyzing facts like your website.

]]>