<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The More SUSE You Buy, the Richer Microsoft Gets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Soliz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-2/#comment-4435</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Soliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4435</guid>
		<description>All right, that&#039;s just an empty and baseless ad hominem.

Open source and free software methods have been tested on the real world with success multiple time, to call them idealistic stuff is not serious talking now in 2007 - soon to be 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right, that&#8217;s just an empty and baseless ad hominem.</p>
<p>Open source and free software methods have been tested on the real world with success multiple time, to call them idealistic stuff is not serious talking now in 2007 &#8211; soon to be 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arrgh</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-2/#comment-4416</link>
		<dc:creator>arrgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 23:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4416</guid>
		<description>Eh, the  linux community is a bunch of idealistic students, once students and wished-were-still students.  The people that make Linux popular in the &quot;real non-student&quot; world are corporations.  Wake up, smell the greenbacks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, the  linux community is a bunch of idealistic students, once students and wished-were-still students.  The people that make Linux popular in the &#8220;real non-student&#8221; world are corporations.  Wake up, smell the greenbacks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-4414</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 20:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4414</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
So, you mean Novell is not rewarding MS for patent trolling ?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Novell is actually &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/05/19/novell-loves-fud/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;capitalising on it&lt;/a&gt;. Masie (Novell head), for example, described Microsoft FUD as a competitive advantage and Novell continues to &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/01/sam-varghese-on-novell/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;use that as a selling point&lt;/a&gt;.

Last week I was told that GNOME was going to use OOXML &#039;support&#039; as a competitive advantage as well. I haven&#039;t seen any concrete proof of this claim, but IIRC, it&#039;s sometime that Jeff (or somebody else) said in Slashdot.

Everyone wants to be a friend of &quot;Big Mike&quot; (to borrow Bruce Peren&#039;s story), then hope to receive a shiny penny in return.

Be aware that you are replying to the pseudonymous, nymshifting &#039;eet&#039;, which is &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/09/30/novell-patrol/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;patrolling Novell blogs on the face of it&lt;/a&gt;. I don&#039;t think he&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/23/astroturfing-microsoft-examples/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;astroturfing&lt;/a&gt; though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
So, you mean Novell is not rewarding MS for patent trolling ?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Novell is actually <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/05/19/novell-loves-fud/" rel="nofollow">capitalising on it</a>. Masie (Novell head), for example, described Microsoft FUD as a competitive advantage and Novell continues to <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/01/sam-varghese-on-novell/" rel="nofollow">use that as a selling point</a>.</p>
<p>Last week I was told that GNOME was going to use OOXML &#8216;support&#8217; as a competitive advantage as well. I haven&#8217;t seen any concrete proof of this claim, but IIRC, it&#8217;s sometime that Jeff (or somebody else) said in Slashdot.</p>
<p>Everyone wants to be a friend of &#8220;Big Mike&#8221; (to borrow Bruce Peren&#8217;s story), then hope to receive a shiny penny in return.</p>
<p>Be aware that you are replying to the pseudonymous, nymshifting &#8216;eet&#8217;, which is <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/09/30/novell-patrol/" rel="nofollow">patrolling Novell blogs on the face of it</a>. I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/23/astroturfing-microsoft-examples/" rel="nofollow">astroturfing</a> though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Soliz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-4411</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Soliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4411</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Absolute and irresponsible nonsense.&lt;/blockquote&gt;So, you mean Novell is not rewarding MS for patent trolling ? 

I notice that there&#039;s a group of people that would like the deal to go unnoticed and blame the people that talk about it for dividing the community or being irresponsible. I must state that the non-sense is coming from you, the division nature of the Novell-MS patent deal and , the imitations that followed and Novell&#039;s own attitude against Linux after the deal are harmful. Threatening people that go reporting the wrong doing by calling them divisive or poisonous is not going to make the deals go away.

Gnome foundation has made a mistake, I am glad that the Linux community is not a bunch of sheep that would avoid criticizing its leaders just avoid some &quot;division&quot; ghost.

I am not sure if your message is just some irresponsible copy paste, this blog post does not seem to have anything to do with your holy community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Absolute and irresponsible nonsense.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, you mean Novell is not rewarding MS for patent trolling ? </p>
<p>I notice that there&#8217;s a group of people that would like the deal to go unnoticed and blame the people that talk about it for dividing the community or being irresponsible. I must state that the non-sense is coming from you, the division nature of the Novell-MS patent deal and , the imitations that followed and Novell&#8217;s own attitude against Linux after the deal are harmful. Threatening people that go reporting the wrong doing by calling them divisive or poisonous is not going to make the deals go away.</p>
<p>Gnome foundation has made a mistake, I am glad that the Linux community is not a bunch of sheep that would avoid criticizing its leaders just avoid some &#8220;division&#8221; ghost.</p>
<p>I am not sure if your message is just some irresponsible copy paste, this blog post does not seem to have anything to do with your holy community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: htrztr</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-4405</link>
		<dc:creator>htrztr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4405</guid>
		<description>Absolute and irresponsible nonsense. 

Roy, are you trying to divide the community again? Despicable enough if you continue to insult developers and, in a broader sense, everyone working on GNOME; but please, leave the community alone.

&lt;font color=&quot;#ff0000&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Note&lt;/b&gt;: comment has been flagged for arriving from a known (eet), pseudonymous, nymshifting, &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/22/eet-strommael-gmx-net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;abusive&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Internet troll&lt;/a&gt; that posts from &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/27/eet-proxies/&quot; title=&quot;The ‘eet’ Nuisance Has Many Proxies/Indentities&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;open proxies and relays around the world&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolute and irresponsible nonsense. </p>
<p>Roy, are you trying to divide the community again? Despicable enough if you continue to insult developers and, in a broader sense, everyone working on GNOME; but please, leave the community alone.</p>
<p><font color="#ff0000"><b>Note</b>: comment has been flagged for arriving from a known (eet), pseudonymous, nymshifting, <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/22/eet-strommael-gmx-net/" rel="nofollow">abusive</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll" rel="nofollow">Internet troll</a> that posts from <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/27/eet-proxies/" title="The ‘eet’ Nuisance Has Many Proxies/Indentities" rel="nofollow">open proxies and relays around the world</a>.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-4393</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 03:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4393</guid>
		<description>Helping OpenSUSE is indirectly helping Novell. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this older explanation&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helping OpenSUSE is indirectly helping Novell. See <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/02/opensuse-103-release/" rel="nofollow">this older explanation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOUGman</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-4392</link>
		<dc:creator>DOUGman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 03:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2007/12/21/novell-suse-tax/#comment-4392</guid>
		<description>Question: What about OpenSUSE?? Is that distro worth while? or should it be dumped as well? Given the the choice I would *most* definitely choose  RedHat server products over Novell&#039;s SLED.

I had hopes for Novell until they went and pulled this crap.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question: What about OpenSUSE?? Is that distro worth while? or should it be dumped as well? Given the the choice I would *most* definitely choose  RedHat server products over Novell&#8217;s SLED.</p>
<p>I had hopes for Novell until they went and pulled this crap.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

