Comments on: Moonlight is Not Silverlight, Silverlight is Not Flash

By: Thomas Hansen

Thomas Hansen — Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:07:03 +0000

Beautifully written. Though why not adopt my naming convention for it; “ActiveX2.0″…?

By: butter

butter — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 08:37:56 +0000

what is the compariosn between thesse 2 ?? adobe and silverfish??

By: CoolGuy

CoolGuy — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:31:53 +0000

http://java.dzone.com/news/farewell-j-jvm

Sun wants to remove J from JVM. Can you realize the implication for this.

They are going directly against .NET – head on !!

Bring it on !!

By: Guy Thomas

Guy Thomas — Wed, 05 Mar 2008 12:50:08 +0000

This article is bang on the money – I couldn’t have said it better myself. Ethical web developers unite and boycott Silvershite now!

By: martin

martin — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:14:10 +0000

just refuse the now optional install of silverlight on any windows machine. once it becomes ‘security’ relevant we must find a way to block it permanently.

By: Spaulding Smails

Spaulding Smails — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:16:58 +0000

Is silverlight active-x 2.0? If so, I’m not sure I even want moonlight on my desktop.

By: Tim B.

Tim B. — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:40:56 +0000

” Do not allow people to draw a comparison between Flash and Silverlight because Adobe is neither interested in discriminating against operating systems, nor has it got a history that demonstrates this.”

Shockwave says hi.

By: Silverfish

Silverfish — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:37:47 +0000

Don’t let the wolverine explode a cloud of silverfish (Silverlight) into you.

The ‘wolverine’ and ‘cloud of silverfish’ is a reference lifted from a Bill Hicks skit. Check YouTube and watch his stuff, his pro-freedom talks and anti-corporate rants are prophetic.