I wrote about XenSource about 30 times here (with new external references that support my assertions) and hundreds of times elsewhere. I’ve watched them closely and I haven’t a doubt about what’s happening.

If you are not convinced, start here. You needn’t even read anything I say. Just follow the links to articles from the mainstream press. You won’t even need to join any dots. It’s all too clear. At times it even comes right from the horse’s (Citrix) mouth.It’s quotes, it’s documented and hopefully this understanding can be passed on to you.

It is a completely different thing to draw up a scenario of what might be and c a l l it a scenario, or to speculate and market your speculations as the irrefutable truth.

Stallman is a visionary, Schestowitz does spiteful gutter paper sensationalism.

What Roy is saying may be speculation, but so was Richard Stallman’s “The Right to Read” until DRM came up.

So was “Microsoft is highjacking Open Source” until now they OFICIALLY DID.

When some people’s speculations end up being true time after time, they become insight, rather than speculation.

You call it speculation. I call it insight. And BTW, I *did* comment about this eventuality when I heard of Citrix buying XenSource and commented so on a private mailing list. I wonder what some of the (then) critics think now…

Lying never helped the truth triumph and aims never justified the means.

This reminds me of folks who want some kind of an authenticated document from Bill Gates to prove that Microsoft wants to kill Free software (or turn it to Fee software) .

Should we also question BayStar connections with Microsoft (which were only found out later, after compelling suspicions)?