<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tim Bray: “[OOXML&#039;s BRM] Process Irretrievably Broken; Complete, Utter, Unadulterated Bullsh*t”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/03/01/brm-ooxml-unadulterated-bull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/03/01/brm-ooxml-unadulterated-bull/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/03/01/brm-ooxml-unadulterated-bull/comment-page-1/#comment-6325</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/01/brm-ooxml-unadulterated-bull/#comment-6325</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m far from a standards expert, but you say &quot;why&quot; and we already have an anwwer. Microsoft abused the system like nobody&#039;s business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m far from a standards expert, but you say &#8220;why&#8221; and we already have an anwwer. Microsoft abused the system like nobody&#8217;s business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Soliz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/03/01/brm-ooxml-unadulterated-bull/comment-page-1/#comment-6322</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Soliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/01/brm-ooxml-unadulterated-bull/#comment-6322</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get why ISO should have a fast track process at all, perhaps it would be useful for upgrades of standards, but even that sounds like too much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get why ISO should have a fast track process at all, perhaps it would be useful for upgrades of standards, but even that sounds like too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

