<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is “OpenSource-isation by Corporation” the Next Big Threat?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/04/07/open-source-corp-hijack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/07/open-source-corp-hijack/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: akf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/07/open-source-corp-hijack/comment-page-1/#comment-7660</link>
		<dc:creator>akf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/07/open-source-corp-hijack/#comment-7660</guid>
		<description>The term Open Source has always been a distraction of Free Software.  In the beginning they said, it was a two step plan: first keep quiet about freedom to get companies hooked and in the second step tell them, what it is really about.

Maybe it would have been a good plan. But the second step never came, and I have my doubts today, whether it was really planned.

So if the “brand” OpenSource goes down the drain, I won&#039;t shed a tear. I use “Free Software”. When it becomes more clear, that it is not the same, the better it is for Free Software.
(That&#039;s also the reason, why I don&#039;t support Perens)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term Open Source has always been a distraction of Free Software.  In the beginning they said, it was a two step plan: first keep quiet about freedom to get companies hooked and in the second step tell them, what it is really about.</p>
<p>Maybe it would have been a good plan. But the second step never came, and I have my doubts today, whether it was really planned.</p>
<p>So if the “brand” OpenSource goes down the drain, I won&#8217;t shed a tear. I use “Free Software”. When it becomes more clear, that it is not the same, the better it is for Free Software.<br />
(That&#8217;s also the reason, why I don&#8217;t support Perens)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

