<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wither Web Standards? (The Adobe and Microsoft Threat)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-3/#comment-8926</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8926</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m attending a talk of Richard Stallman in about 30 minutes. He came to Manchester, so I&#039;ll probably get the chance to say &quot;hi&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m attending a talk of Richard Stallman in about 30 minutes. He came to Manchester, so I&#8217;ll probably get the chance to say &#8220;hi&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-3/#comment-8923</link>
		<dc:creator>akf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8923</guid>
		<description>Nice one.

But better leave the &quot;-p preview&quot; away...

P.S.:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZNVLzdKDeyQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one.</p>
<p>But better leave the &#8220;-p preview&#8221; away&#8230;</p>
<p>P.S.:<br />
<a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZNVLzdKDeyQ" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZNVLzdKDeyQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-3/#comment-8882</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8882</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had Pytube installed for a while, but Google applied some changes to YouTube on the face of it, so Pytube&#039;s underlying code was no longer compatible (I didn&#039;t try to get the latest version).

Thanks to akf I got the whole pipeline working very quickly, so I&#039;ll produce Oggs and host them here in the future if it&#039;s legally possible. Here&#039;s a corny one that I&#039;ll add later:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/hackers.ogg&quot; title=&quot;View Ogg Theora version&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/ogg-128x128.png&quot; alt=&quot;Ogg Theora&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

All those videos that accumulate inside the home directory slow down my backups, but more Oggs on the Web can have a positive effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had Pytube installed for a while, but Google applied some changes to YouTube on the face of it, so Pytube&#8217;s underlying code was no longer compatible (I didn&#8217;t try to get the latest version).</p>
<p>Thanks to akf I got the whole pipeline working very quickly, so I&#8217;ll produce Oggs and host them here in the future if it&#8217;s legally possible. Here&#8217;s a corny one that I&#8217;ll add later:</p>
<p><a href="http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/hackers.ogg" title="View Ogg Theora version" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://boycottnovell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/ogg-128x128.png" alt="Ogg Theora" /></a></p>
<p>All those videos that accumulate inside the home directory slow down my backups, but more Oggs on the Web can have a positive effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hassan Ibraheem</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-3/#comment-8880</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan Ibraheem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 12:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8880</guid>
		<description>I use a tool called &lt;a href=&quot;www.bashterritory.com/pytube/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pytube&lt;/a&gt; and it&#039;s great, it searches and downloads YouTube videos, and convert and all that stuff.
I highly recommend it, but the website is down for now, you may check some info &lt;a href=&quot;https://launchpad.net/pytube/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; till the project&#039;s site is back online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a tool called <a href="www.bashterritory.com/pytube/" rel="nofollow">Pytube</a> and it&#8217;s great, it searches and downloads YouTube videos, and convert and all that stuff.<br />
I highly recommend it, but the website is down for now, you may check some info <a href="https://launchpad.net/pytube/" rel="nofollow">here</a> till the project&#8217;s site is back online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxIsFun</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-2/#comment-8870</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxIsFun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>akf check out Pytube to download YouTube videos.

http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html

The SWF specification has been published since 1998. Until today, the specification had a license agreement associated with it, which said that developers could write software to output SWF but could not make software that would “play” SWF files. These license terms were initially included to prevent fragmentation, which most client technologies have experienced. These terms have worked well for Flash Player over the past decade as it now reaches over 98% of PCs on the Web with a consistent runtime, enabling things such as the video revolution we see today across the Web. With this announcement, Adobe is removing this restriction from the SWF specification, as we have established a consistent runtime and we want to ensure the industry can confidently continue to support the SWF format. This will permit the development of applications that “play” SWF files. Adobe will of course remain focused on making the best, most reliable and consistently distributed implementation across desktops and devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akf check out Pytube to download YouTube videos.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html</a></p>
<p>The SWF specification has been published since 1998. Until today, the specification had a license agreement associated with it, which said that developers could write software to output SWF but could not make software that would “play” SWF files. These license terms were initially included to prevent fragmentation, which most client technologies have experienced. These terms have worked well for Flash Player over the past decade as it now reaches over 98% of PCs on the Web with a consistent runtime, enabling things such as the video revolution we see today across the Web. With this announcement, Adobe is removing this restriction from the SWF specification, as we have established a consistent runtime and we want to ensure the industry can confidently continue to support the SWF format. This will permit the development of applications that “play” SWF files. Adobe will of course remain focused on making the best, most reliable and consistently distributed implementation across desktops and devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxIsFun</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-2/#comment-8869</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxIsFun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8869</guid>
		<description>akf check out Pytube to download YouTube videos.

what i can understand is previously adobe allowed to write put not play SWF/FLV/F4V files. Now they are allowing to write and play without any license restriction. Great job adobe !

http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html

The SWF specification has been published since 1998. Until today, the specification had a license agreement associated with it, which said that developers could write software to output SWF but could not make software that would “play” SWF files. These license terms were initially included to prevent fragmentation, which most client technologies have experienced. These terms have worked well for Flash Player over the past decade as it now reaches over 98% of PCs on the Web with a consistent runtime, enabling things such as the video revolution we see today across the Web. With this announcement, Adobe is removing this restriction from the SWF specification, as we have established a consistent runtime and we want to ensure the industry can confidently continue to support the SWF format. This will permit the development of applications that “play” SWF files. Adobe will of course remain focused on making the best, most reliable and consistently distributed implementation across desktops and devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akf check out Pytube to download YouTube videos.</p>
<p>what i can understand is previously adobe allowed to write put not play SWF/FLV/F4V files. Now they are allowing to write and play without any license restriction. Great job adobe !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html</a></p>
<p>The SWF specification has been published since 1998. Until today, the specification had a license agreement associated with it, which said that developers could write software to output SWF but could not make software that would “play” SWF files. These license terms were initially included to prevent fragmentation, which most client technologies have experienced. These terms have worked well for Flash Player over the past decade as it now reaches over 98% of PCs on the Web with a consistent runtime, enabling things such as the video revolution we see today across the Web. With this announcement, Adobe is removing this restriction from the SWF specification, as we have established a consistent runtime and we want to ensure the industry can confidently continue to support the SWF format. This will permit the development of applications that “play” SWF files. Adobe will of course remain focused on making the best, most reliable and consistently distributed implementation across desktops and devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxIsFun</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-2/#comment-8868</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxIsFun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8868</guid>
		<description>akf check out Pytube to download YouTube videos.

what i can understand is previously adobe allowed to write put not play SWF/FLV/F4V files. Now they are allowing to write and play without any license restriction. Great job adobe !

http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html

&lt;i&gt;The SWF specification has been published since 1998. Until today, the specification had a license agreement associated with it, which said that developers could write software to output SWF but could not make software that would “play” SWF files. These license terms were initially included to prevent fragmentation, which most client technologies have experienced. These terms have worked well for Flash Player over the past decade as it now reaches over 98% of PCs on the Web with a consistent runtime, enabling things such as the video revolution we see today across the Web. With this announcement, Adobe is removing this restriction from the SWF specification, as we have established a consistent runtime and we want to ensure the industry can confidently continue to support the SWF format. This will permit the development of applications that “play” SWF files. Adobe will of course remain focused on making the best, most reliable and consistently distributed implementation across desktops and devices.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akf check out Pytube to download YouTube videos.</p>
<p>what i can understand is previously adobe allowed to write put not play SWF/FLV/F4V files. Now they are allowing to write and play without any license restriction. Great job adobe !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/faq/index.html</a></p>
<p><i>The SWF specification has been published since 1998. Until today, the specification had a license agreement associated with it, which said that developers could write software to output SWF but could not make software that would “play” SWF files. These license terms were initially included to prevent fragmentation, which most client technologies have experienced. These terms have worked well for Flash Player over the past decade as it now reaches over 98% of PCs on the Web with a consistent runtime, enabling things such as the video revolution we see today across the Web. With this announcement, Adobe is removing this restriction from the SWF specification, as we have established a consistent runtime and we want to ensure the industry can confidently continue to support the SWF format. This will permit the development of applications that “play” SWF files. Adobe will of course remain focused on making the best, most reliable and consistently distributed implementation across desktops and devices.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-2/#comment-8866</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 11:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8866</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that!

I have the feeling that I got your E-mail and replied, but I can&#039;t find it in my archives. I&#039;ll take a look and see if I can manage quick Ogg conversion, with the goal of making more Oggs available where copying is permitted.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that!</p>
<p>I have the feeling that I got your E-mail and replied, but I can&#8217;t find it in my archives. I&#8217;ll take a look and see if I can manage quick Ogg conversion, with the goal of making more Oggs available where copying is permitted.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-2/#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>akf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>Okay, I explain it here for short:

You can download it with the service on:
http://www.downloadyoutubevideos.com/

Then, at least on a current debian lenny system you can convert it like this:
ffmpeg2theora -p preview --sync file.flv

You can try other settings, but you need the --sync option.

see http://www.v2v.cc/~j/ffmpeg2theora/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I explain it here for short:</p>
<p>You can download it with the service on:<br />
<a href="http://www.downloadyoutubevideos.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.downloadyoutubevideos.com/</a></p>
<p>Then, at least on a current debian lenny system you can convert it like this:<br />
ffmpeg2theora -p preview &#8211;sync file.flv</p>
<p>You can try other settings, but you need the &#8211;sync option.</p>
<p>see <a href="http://www.v2v.cc/~j/ffmpeg2theora/" rel="nofollow">http://www.v2v.cc/~j/ffmpeg2theora/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-1/#comment-8860</link>
		<dc:creator>akf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 10:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8860</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t want me to post your address here, do you?

I used an e-mail address, which I found on your private homepage... after long searching.  And I encrypted it with the gpg-key I found there. It was on 14. Apr.
Shall I try to send it again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t want me to post your address here, do you?</p>
<p>I used an e-mail address, which I found on your private homepage&#8230; after long searching.  And I encrypted it with the gpg-key I found there. It was on 14. Apr.<br />
Shall I try to send it again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-1/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>akf, which address did you send it to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>akf, which address did you send it to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-1/#comment-8854</link>
		<dc:creator>akf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8854</guid>
		<description>I sent you an e-mail a while ago, trying to explain how I can convert flash video to theora now. But you haven&#039;t answered that mail. Did you get it?

For short: ffmpeg2theora can do it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent you an e-mail a while ago, trying to explain how I can convert flash video to theora now. But you haven&#8217;t answered that mail. Did you get it?</p>
<p>For short: ffmpeg2theora can do it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-1/#comment-8852</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 08:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8852</guid>
		<description>This ought to help gnash. Good move by Adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ought to help gnash. Good move by Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hassan Ibraheem</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/comment-page-1/#comment-8850</link>
		<dc:creator>Hassan Ibraheem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/30/web-standards-vs-drm-vectors/#comment-8850</guid>
		<description>Adobe seems to be taking steps in the right direction, today they announced releasing Flash (SWF/FLV) file formats specification with no licensing restrictions (not sure exactly, but they say so).
It&#039;s not the Adobe Flash Player, but it&#039;s a good step I think.
Source: http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adobe seems to be taking steps in the right direction, today they announced releasing Flash (SWF/FLV) file formats specification with no licensing restrictions (not sure exactly, but they say so).<br />
It&#8217;s not the Adobe Flash Player, but it&#8217;s a good step I think.<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/openscreenproject/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

