<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links 12/05/2008: GNU/Linux in Education, Finnish Award for Ubuntu</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZiggyFish</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>ZiggyFish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the soon to be new government, well fix US&#039;s stand on Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the soon to be new government, well fix US&#8217;s stand on Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Bixler</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-9586</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Bixler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/#comment-9586</guid>
		<description>In the case of the US, the reason for the lax anti-trust enforcement is largely the ideological bent of the current administration.  They strongly prefer that the government takes a passive role when it comes to regulating the market.  A rally cry during the Reagan years was to &quot;get government off your back.&quot;  Now, it is very clear to that he was referring to big business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of the US, the reason for the lax anti-trust enforcement is largely the ideological bent of the current administration.  They strongly prefer that the government takes a passive role when it comes to regulating the market.  A rally cry during the Reagan years was to &#8220;get government off your back.&#8221;  Now, it is very clear to that he was referring to big business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-9582</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/#comment-9582</guid>
		<description>The Free Software movement predates Microsoft&#039;s dominance. Had it not been Microsoft, it probably would have been someone else, unless of course there was diversity in the market and far less abuse of power.

Watching the iTunes/iPod monopoly, however, not to mention Intel&#039;s recently-exposed corruptions (been going on for ages), I believe the problem is a regulatory one. The market rules just don&#039;t work. That&#039;s what anti-Trust laws were made for a long time ago, but some governments neglect them (possibly given some dosh to do so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Free Software movement predates Microsoft&#8217;s dominance. Had it not been Microsoft, it probably would have been someone else, unless of course there was diversity in the market and far less abuse of power.</p>
<p>Watching the iTunes/iPod monopoly, however, not to mention Intel&#8217;s recently-exposed corruptions (been going on for ages), I believe the problem is a regulatory one. The market rules just don&#8217;t work. That&#8217;s what anti-Trust laws were made for a long time ago, but some governments neglect them (possibly given some dosh to do so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Challenger</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-9581</link>
		<dc:creator>Challenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/#comment-9581</guid>
		<description>there would be no GPL/FOSS/Linux/OpenJDK/OpenOffice...if it wasnt for M$..

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there would be no GPL/FOSS/Linux/OpenJDK/OpenOffice&#8230;if it wasnt for M$..</p>
<p> <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Challenger</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-9579</link>
		<dc:creator>Challenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 16:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/12/finnish-award-for-ubuntu/#comment-9579</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I think that M$ is responsible to some extent to the growth of FOSS and Linux. If it wouldn&#039;t be for the exploitation of M$ - we wouldnt have seen such rapid adoption of FOSS by other companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I think that M$ is responsible to some extent to the growth of FOSS and Linux. If it wouldn&#8217;t be for the exploitation of M$ &#8211; we wouldnt have seen such rapid adoption of FOSS by other companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

