<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Document Formats Roundup: ODF Gets the Upper Hand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-10629</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 09:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/#comment-10629</guid>
		<description>Poor Patrick getting stick again.

I read the ZDNet article as saying that the OOXML complexity was about having a single version of Office potentially reading two different formats, and how they would handle the upgrade, not that the changes for OOXML were so complex they had to punt them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Patrick getting stick again.</p>
<p>I read the ZDNet article as saying that the OOXML complexity was about having a single version of Office potentially reading two different formats, and how they would handle the upgrade, not that the changes for OOXML were so complex they had to punt them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-10621</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 06:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/#comment-10621</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about it because while it&#039;s a defeat, Microsoft could try to snatch a victory and turn the situation to its own advantage from inside the Committee. Remember Patrick Durusau? Watch this photo:

http://adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry080409-221633</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about it because while it&#8217;s a defeat, Microsoft could try to snatch a victory and turn the situation to its own advantage from inside the Committee. Remember Patrick Durusau? Watch this photo:</p>
<p><a href="http://adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry080409-221633" rel="nofollow">http://adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry080409-221633</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/comment-page-1/#comment-10614</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 05:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/23/odf-moox-roundup-power-shift/#comment-10614</guid>
		<description>In fact, MS is admitting defeat for OOXML by adding ODF support to Office 2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, MS is admitting defeat for OOXML by adding ODF support to Office 2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

