<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: India Appeals Against OOXML, Joining Brazil, South Africa, Maybe More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc Bollen</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-11353</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Bollen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/#comment-11353</guid>
		<description>The text of the Brazilian letter, published by Andy Updegrove (http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080529150227123), seems very clear to me:

&quot;The Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT), as a P member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC34, would like to present, to ISO/IEC/JTC1 and ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC34, this appeal for reconsideration of the ISO/IEC DIS 29500 final result.

This appeal is based on two main considerations:
    1. Brazil considers that the BRM was inconclusive.
    2. Brazil considers that the final version of the ISO/IEC DIS 29500 text shall be released immediately.

[...]

For all those reasons presented, Brazil kindly request that the final result of ISO/IEC DIS 29500 should be reconsidered by ISO/IEC/JTC1 and ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC34.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The text of the Brazilian letter, published by Andy Updegrove (<a href="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080529150227123" rel="nofollow">http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080529150227123</a>), seems very clear to me:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT), as a P member of ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC34, would like to present, to ISO/IEC/JTC1 and ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC34, this appeal for reconsideration of the ISO/IEC DIS 29500 final result.</p>
<p>This appeal is based on two main considerations:<br />
    1. Brazil considers that the BRM was inconclusive.<br />
    2. Brazil considers that the final version of the ISO/IEC DIS 29500 text shall be released immediately.</p>
<p>[...]</p>
<p>For all those reasons presented, Brazil kindly request that the final result of ISO/IEC DIS 29500 should be reconsidered by ISO/IEC/JTC1 and ISO/IEC/JTC1/SC34.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-11348</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/#comment-11348</guid>
		<description>@David: in all likelihood, any appeals received by next Monday will also be accepted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David: in all likelihood, any appeals received by next Monday will also be accepted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-11347</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/#comment-11347</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m optimistically assuming that some filings were not announced. This does happen (same with final votes on OOXML back at the end of March).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m optimistically assuming that some filings were not announced. This does happen (same with final votes on OOXML back at the end of March).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-11346</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/#comment-11346</guid>
		<description>I believe that&#039;s it for appeals by the deadline (yesterday), so Malaysia is probably too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that&#8217;s it for appeals by the deadline (yesterday), so Malaysia is probably too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxIsFun</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-11338</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxIsFun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 14:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/05/30/india-brazil-sa-appeal/#comment-11338</guid>
		<description>W00t !! OOXML just got PWNED !

hax0r!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W00t !! OOXML just got PWNED !</p>
<p>hax0r!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

