<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: News Reports Versus Informmecrials (Commercials Disguised as Articles)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/07/30/commercials-disguised-as-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/07/30/commercials-disguised-as-articles/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mpz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/07/30/commercials-disguised-as-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-17323</link>
		<dc:creator>mpz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/07/30/commercials-disguised-as-articles/#comment-17323</guid>
		<description>Of course, news-blog authors (how can you call them editors?) are not journalists, they have no ethics to uphold, and such sites have no requirements of disclosure.  No offense intended of course.

On the other hand, if they fail to keep their independence, then they will lose users and eventually money.  Although they may do some damage along the way.  Technology and game sites seem to be most prone to this - or maybe that is because those are the ones I tend to read.

Unfortunately of course there are many more ms &#039;fanbois&#039; out there than otherwise -- who don&#039;t see any problem and in fact may be attracted to such marketing on a blog roll (hell, even groklaw has been spruiking MS PR lately if not intentionally), so maybe it is just a deliberate tactic to gain users.  And getting the more rabid fanbois (e.g. apple, etc) riled up never hurt a site&#039;s traffic too much did it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, news-blog authors (how can you call them editors?) are not journalists, they have no ethics to uphold, and such sites have no requirements of disclosure.  No offense intended of course.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if they fail to keep their independence, then they will lose users and eventually money.  Although they may do some damage along the way.  Technology and game sites seem to be most prone to this &#8211; or maybe that is because those are the ones I tend to read.</p>
<p>Unfortunately of course there are many more ms &#8216;fanbois&#8217; out there than otherwise &#8212; who don&#8217;t see any problem and in fact may be attracted to such marketing on a blog roll (hell, even groklaw has been spruiking MS PR lately if not intentionally), so maybe it is just a deliberate tactic to gain users.  And getting the more rabid fanbois (e.g. apple, etc) riled up never hurt a site&#8217;s traffic too much did it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

