Comments on: No Mono in Fedora 10 (“Cambridge”) Live CD http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-4/#comment-28591 Roy Schestowitz Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:53:22 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-28591 Why not use programming languages not owned and controlled by a corporate aggressor? Why not use programming languages not owned and controlled by a corporate aggressor?

]]> By: Bryon http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-4/#comment-28573 Bryon Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:23:23 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-28573 Without "Mono", How can I write C# programs on Linux ? Without “Mono”, How can I write C# programs on Linux ?

]]> By: Doreen http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-4/#comment-20054 Doreen Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:42:13 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-20054 Could someone advise if Mono is installed in Linpus Linux Lite which is pre-installed in the Acer Aspire One Mini? TIA Could someone advise if Mono is installed in Linpus Linux Lite which is pre-installed in the Acer Aspire One Mini? TIA

]]> By: Faldegast http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-4/#comment-19688 Faldegast Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:57:36 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19688 While i actually like mono i agree that it should be removed from Fedora and CentOS. I would prefer to install mono from its own repositories, that worked a lot better. Mono is progressing rapidly and its one of the few components where i actually wanna be at the edge. While i actually like mono i agree that it should be removed from Fedora and CentOS. I would prefer to install mono from its own repositories, that worked a lot better. Mono is progressing rapidly and its one of the few components where i actually wanna be at the edge.

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-3/#comment-19652 Roy Schestowitz Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:17:32 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19652 Hi, 'eet'. Nice nymshift. Your IP gives it all away, never mind the obvious giveaway that's your nym. Hi, ‘eet’. Nice nymshift. Your IP gives it all away, never mind the obvious giveaway that’s your nym.

]]> By: stevetheFLY http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-3/#comment-19651 stevetheFLY Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:08:30 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19651 you people really suck. R U stoopid? it's obvious this is only a mistake in PCLinuxOS's package management. go-oo is used in Ubuntu, too. <font color="#ff0000"><b>Note</b>: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/22/eet-strommael-gmx-net/" rel="nofollow">abusive</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll" rel="nofollow">Internet troll</a> that posts from <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/27/eet-proxies/" title="The ‘eet’ Nuisance Has Many Proxies/Indentities" rel="nofollow">open proxies and relays around the world</a>.</font> you people really suck. R U stoopid? it’s obvious this is only a mistake in PCLinuxOS’s package management. go-oo is used in Ubuntu, too.

Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from a possible incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-3/#comment-19631 Roy Schestowitz Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:12:40 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19631 Excellent find. Thanks, Victor. It's not very surprising. Excellent find. Thanks, Victor. It’s not very surprising.

]]> By: Victor Soliz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-3/#comment-19630 Victor Soliz Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:07:00 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19630 it is ok to have it in repos. Bad to have it necessary for default. I just found this in groklaw: http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20080805144125413&title=How+to+remove+Mono+(M%24)+from+Ubuntu+Hardy+Heron&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=716633#c716651 Is this true? And why does it happen? Why would ooO require libmono in PCLinuxOS? Are they using go-ooo? That would suck, PCLinuxOS is kind of over hyped and it would suck if such a popular distro supported Novell's ill intentions like that. it is ok to have it in repos. Bad to have it necessary for default.

I just found this in groklaw: http://www.groklaw.net/comment.php?mode=display&sid=20080805144125413&title=How+to+remove+Mono+(M%24)+from+Ubuntu+Hardy+Heron&type=article&order=&hideanonymous=0&pid=716633#c716651

Is this true? And why does it happen? Why would ooO require libmono in PCLinuxOS? Are they using go-ooo? That would suck, PCLinuxOS is kind of over hyped and it would suck if such a popular distro supported Novell’s ill intentions like that.

]]> By: Ashish Shukla http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-3/#comment-19572 Ashish Shukla Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:05:46 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19572 Hope to see mono wiped off from their repositories too... :-D Hope to see mono wiped off from their repositories too… :-D

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-2/#comment-19530 Roy Schestowitz Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:02:03 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19530 Here is a <a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=881672" rel="nofollow">good place to start</a>. Here is a good place to start.

]]> By: Hun http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-2/#comment-19528 Hun Sat, 16 Aug 2008 08:59:47 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19528 gggggggggggggggggggg i am checking whether ubuntu is stil infected with mononono gggggggggggggggggggg

i am checking whether ubuntu is stil infected with mononono

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-2/#comment-19515 Roy Schestowitz Sat, 16 Aug 2008 06:52:42 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19515 Yes, you beat me t it. We area already aware of Ubuntu's <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/22/mark-shuttleworth-on-patents/" rel="nofollow">disappointing stance on the subject</a>. Yes, you beat me t it. We area already aware of Ubuntu’s disappointing stance on the subject.

]]> By: gggggg http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-2/#comment-19511 gggggg Sat, 16 Aug 2008 06:44:16 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19511 @Hun You are confusing things. We're talking about fedora! @Hun

You are confusing things. We’re talking about fedora!

]]> By: Hun http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-2/#comment-19507 Hun Sat, 16 Aug 2008 04:46:17 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19507 http://news.softpedia.com/images/extra/LINUX/large/ubuntu810alpha4-large_003.jpg Tomboy not in the panel but its still installed. Fspot still there... http://news.softpedia.com/images/extra/LINUX/large/ubuntu810alpha4-large_005.jpg http://news.softpedia.com/images/extra/LINUX/large/ubuntu810alpha4-large_003.jpg

Tomboy not in the panel but its still installed.

Fspot still there…

http://news.softpedia.com/images/extra/LINUX/large/ubuntu810alpha4-large_005.jpg

]]> By: neo http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-1/#comment-19504 neo Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:33:42 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19504 "Mono is still included in the default install of Fedora w/ GNOME " Umm, No. The live cd is the installer that is recommended by Fedora for desktop users. “Mono is still included in the default install of Fedora w/ GNOME ”

Umm, No. The live cd is the installer that is recommended by Fedora for desktop users.

]]> By: HC http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-1/#comment-19492 HC Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:13:29 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19492 I have been using Ubuntu up until now, but this is really good. I will look at switching over the weekend also. I have been using Ubuntu up until now, but this is really good. I will look at switching over the weekend also.

]]> By: mopfus http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-1/#comment-19491 mopfus Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:03:46 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19491 Sadly, there is a difference between "No Mono on the Live CD" and "No Mono in the installed distro" Mono is still included in the default install of Fedora w/ GNOME Sadly, there is a difference between “No Mono on the Live CD” and “No Mono in the installed distro”

Mono is still included in the default install of Fedora w/ GNOME

]]> By: Victor Soliz http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-1/#comment-19487 Victor Soliz Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:44:44 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19487 Is that the default look? So nice, with it and no Mono I might switch to Fedora. Is that the default look? So nice, with it and no Mono I might switch to Fedora.

]]> By: self_liar http://techrights.org/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/comment-page-1/#comment-19474 self_liar Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:52:20 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/15/no-mono-in-fedora-10/#comment-19474 Very Good!!!!! Because of this, i will install fedora in next release. And I will do a lot of publicity about this Thanks Roy! Very Good!!!!!

Because of this, i will install fedora in next release.

And I will do a lot of publicity about this

Thanks Roy!

]]>