<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Might Sabotage Google&#8217;s Big Announcement Using Shills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/09/03/sabotage-google-using-shills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/09/03/sabotage-google-using-shills/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/09/03/sabotage-google-using-shills/comment-page-1/#comment-21676</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/09/03/sabotage-google-using-shills/#comment-21676</guid>
		<description>To be honest, Chrome *is* a little light on.   However, you get the source-code with it.  How many initial release beta browsers came with source?

Still - it appeared stable when I tried it for about an hour yesterday, AND it used a fraction of the resources of Firefox - about 30% of the memory.

Font overriding and advert and flash blocking are real usability requirements that I would personally require before ditching firefox, although I can&#039;t see google blocking their own adverts in their own browser?  (although I would drop firefox in a jiffy if they did those 3 simple things - no doubt some hacker will feel the same way and do it, even if I can&#039;t be arsed myself).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, Chrome *is* a little light on.   However, you get the source-code with it.  How many initial release beta browsers came with source?</p>
<p>Still &#8211; it appeared stable when I tried it for about an hour yesterday, AND it used a fraction of the resources of Firefox &#8211; about 30% of the memory.</p>
<p>Font overriding and advert and flash blocking are real usability requirements that I would personally require before ditching firefox, although I can&#8217;t see google blocking their own adverts in their own browser?  (although I would drop firefox in a jiffy if they did those 3 simple things &#8211; no doubt some hacker will feel the same way and do it, even if I can&#8217;t be arsed myself).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

