<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opposition to Broad/Software Patents Grows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/10/03/opposition-to-software-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/03/opposition-to-software-patents/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/03/opposition-to-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-31497</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/03/opposition-to-software-patents/#comment-31497</guid>
		<description>BTW, here is an edit to one of the articles you quoted:
&quot;EDIT 8-24-08: Commenter Owen (see below) points out that LLVM’s license actually stipulates better guarantees about the use of patents than i originally thought. It’s quite possible that I misunderstood the discussion on Saturday, or that somebody there was misinformed about the LLVM’s license.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, here is an edit to one of the articles you quoted:<br />
&#8220;EDIT 8-24-08: Commenter Owen (see below) points out that LLVM’s license actually stipulates better guarantees about the use of patents than i originally thought. It’s quite possible that I misunderstood the discussion on Saturday, or that somebody there was misinformed about the LLVM’s license.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/03/opposition-to-software-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-31496</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/03/opposition-to-software-patents/#comment-31496</guid>
		<description>On Apple and FOSS, that is another off-topic mess altogether dating back to when NeXT decided to develop a Obj-C front-end for GCC for the NeXTStep OS around 1990.
On Apple&#039;s tying of hardware with software, when I heard that Psystar was going to use that as a challenge to the Apple vs Psystar lawsuit, I posted this blog article:
http://yuhong386.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!57E2793D0C53276F!164.entry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Apple and FOSS, that is another off-topic mess altogether dating back to when NeXT decided to develop a Obj-C front-end for GCC for the NeXTStep OS around 1990.<br />
On Apple&#8217;s tying of hardware with software, when I heard that Psystar was going to use that as a challenge to the Apple vs Psystar lawsuit, I posted this blog article:<br />
<a href="http://yuhong386.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!57E2793D0C53276F!164.entry" rel="nofollow">http://yuhong386.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!57E2793D0C53276F!164.entry</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

