<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BoycottNovell Goes Shopping for Mono Patent &#8216;Protection&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-10/#comment-27143</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-27143</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the downside of criticism, but Microsoft tries to accommodate its intellectual monopolies in GNU/Linux so as to make it &quot;not free&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the downside of criticism, but Microsoft tries to accommodate its intellectual monopolies in GNU/Linux so as to make it &#8220;not free&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DugC</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-9/#comment-27136</link>
		<dc:creator>DugC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-27136</guid>
		<description>For what it is worth, I was an .NET developer, got interested in Mono and moved to developing for Linux.  Otherwise I wouldn&#039;t have.  I am not going to throw away the environment I know and jump ship to Java, so Mono was a great open door for me.   I never paid a penny to use it either.  i think that a lot of hard work has gone into it and there is no need to try to paint it as something evil.  Raise concerns tactfully - ok; get personal about the developers - not on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it is worth, I was an .NET developer, got interested in Mono and moved to developing for Linux.  Otherwise I wouldn&#8217;t have.  I am not going to throw away the environment I know and jump ship to Java, so Mono was a great open door for me.   I never paid a penny to use it either.  i think that a lot of hard work has gone into it and there is no need to try to paint it as something evil.  Raise concerns tactfully &#8211; ok; get personal about the developers &#8211; not on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-9/#comment-26989</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26989</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sum Yung Gai&quot; is right; if the Samba people decompiled Windows or something they would be in trouble. As it stands, they sniff the wire protocol and that&#039;s fine, because it&#039;s outside the scope of the EULA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sum Yung Gai&#8221; is right; if the Samba people decompiled Windows or something they would be in trouble. As it stands, they sniff the wire protocol and that&#8217;s fine, because it&#8217;s outside the scope of the EULA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sum Yung Gai</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-9/#comment-26866</link>
		<dc:creator>Sum Yung Gai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26866</guid>
		<description>That provision of the MS EULA is not enforceable in the United States, and probably not in Australia either, where the Samba work was originally done.  And even if it were enforceable, it didn&#039;t apply.  It applied to the *software*...NOT the protocol on the wire.  Perhaps MS have changed that wording in recent years, but it&#039;s still unenforceable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That provision of the MS EULA is not enforceable in the United States, and probably not in Australia either, where the Samba work was originally done.  And even if it were enforceable, it didn&#8217;t apply.  It applied to the *software*&#8230;NOT the protocol on the wire.  Perhaps MS have changed that wording in recent years, but it&#8217;s still unenforceable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eldon</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-9/#comment-26784</link>
		<dc:creator>Eldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26784</guid>
		<description>MS doesn&#039;t need patents to go after Samba.  Samba is reverse engineered which directly violates the MS EULA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS doesn&#8217;t need patents to go after Samba.  Samba is reverse engineered which directly violates the MS EULA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-9/#comment-26714</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26714</guid>
		<description>*please discuss why it is evident that Roy has been working for me all the time*

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*please discuss why it is evident that Roy has been working for me all the time*</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-8/#comment-26712</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26712</guid>
		<description>Dear readers of this blog,

I feel ever so embarassed that the smart people who run boycottnovell.com have unmasked my evil schemes and my henchmen. Please forgive me.

As a token of my good will, I&#039;d like to tell Roy that he is actually working for me, too. It hasn&#039;t been on purpose, of course, poor Roy; you have been acting under the power of a post-hypnotic command. I am ever so sorry, Roy! Now, let me free you with a snip of my fingers... *snip!*

And also Roy, you are, in reality, my illegitimate son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear readers of this blog,</p>
<p>I feel ever so embarassed that the smart people who run boycottnovell.com have unmasked my evil schemes and my henchmen. Please forgive me.</p>
<p>As a token of my good will, I&#8217;d like to tell Roy that he is actually working for me, too. It hasn&#8217;t been on purpose, of course, poor Roy; you have been acting under the power of a post-hypnotic command. I am ever so sorry, Roy! Now, let me free you with a snip of my fingers&#8230; *snip!*</p>
<p>And also Roy, you are, in reality, my illegitimate son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-8/#comment-26678</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26678</guid>
		<description>@Roy: I don&#039;t think that makes any real difference. The argument remains a cheap attack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roy: I don&#8217;t think that makes any real difference. The argument remains a cheap attack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevetheFLY</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-8/#comment-26677</link>
		<dc:creator>stevetheFLY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26677</guid>
		<description>Gaaaawd. The utter stupidy of it! &quot;hallloo, Microsoooft; I wanna buy your protectshion!&quot; Yuk. And the headstrong willingness of Roy to write untruth against his better knowledge. It really makes you wann throw up.


&lt;font color=&quot;#ff0000&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Note&lt;/b&gt;: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/22/eet-strommael-gmx-net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;abusive&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Internet troll&lt;/a&gt; that posts from &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/27/eet-proxies/&quot; title=&quot;The ‘eet’ Nuisance Has Many Proxies/Indentities&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;open proxies and relays around the world&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/font&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaaaawd. The utter stupidy of it! &#8220;hallloo, Microsoooft; I wanna buy your protectshion!&#8221; Yuk. And the headstrong willingness of Roy to write untruth against his better knowledge. It really makes you wann throw up.</p>
<p><font color="#ff0000"><b>Note</b>: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/22/eet-strommael-gmx-net/" rel="nofollow">abusive</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll" rel="nofollow">Internet troll</a> that posts from <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/11/27/eet-proxies/" title="The ‘eet’ Nuisance Has Many Proxies/Indentities" rel="nofollow">open proxies and relays around the world</a>.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-8/#comment-26676</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26676</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s companies (corporate agenda), not individuals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s companies (corporate agenda), not individuals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-8/#comment-26675</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26675</guid>
		<description>@Roy:

I think people would make less of your associations if you didn&#039;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/09/dangerous-by-association/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;harp&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/20/antitrust-silverlight/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/18/scalix-xandros-server/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/17/mandriva-association-turbolinux/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;association&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/23/rpath-ballnux-by-association/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;constantly&lt;/a&gt;.

As you say, it&#039;s a cheap attack, so hopefully we won&#039;t be seeing attacks by association in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roy:</p>
<p>I think people would make less of your associations if you didn&#8217;t <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/08/09/dangerous-by-association/" rel="nofollow">harp</a> <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/10/20/antitrust-silverlight/" rel="nofollow">on</a> <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/07/18/scalix-xandros-server/" rel="nofollow">about</a> <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/01/17/mandriva-association-turbolinux/" rel="nofollow">association</a> <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/04/23/rpath-ballnux-by-association/" rel="nofollow">constantly</a>.</p>
<p>As you say, it&#8217;s a cheap attack, so hopefully we won&#8217;t be seeing attacks by association in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-7/#comment-26674</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26674</guid>
		<description>Slashdot User,

If they didn&#039;t use that to discredit the messenger, they would find something else. That&#039;s their nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slashdot User,</p>
<p>If they didn&#8217;t use that to discredit the messenger, they would find something else. That&#8217;s their nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Zucchi</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-7/#comment-26652</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Zucchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26652</guid>
		<description>Hey Roy,

Most people would not want to put who they work for on their personal `blog&#039; - for the express reason that it may imply some sort of official/company position.  How you could claim that everyone would normally show their employer on their `blog&#039; is pretty strange.  There is a difference between &#039;I work for a company and get paid to blog to support their position in secret&#039;, and &#039;I work for a company and love my job and like to talk about all the great stuff I am/we are doing, as well as movies/food/friends/etc&#039;.

To claim that you didn&#039;t know Jeff was an employee of Novell does suggest you should do some more research.  Jeff has been involved in Ximian/Novell almost as long as Miguel has.  And not only that, has likewise been very open and very public about it - posting thousands of e-mails on public lists over the last 8 years for example.  I also know him personally and worked with him for several years and think he&#039;s a pretty decent bloke who is I know is completely dedicated to free software, and I feel somewhat offended that you are attacking him (and others, such as Miguel - disagree yes, but why attack?).

I, like others, know you do a lot of jumping to quick conclusions on often poorly researched facts, but tend to forgive you because also coalesce a lot of interesting links and opinion and seem to hold a position on a number of issues that I generally agree with.  However, I do wish you&#039;d stop these personal attacks - all they do is upset people who are more complex than you make them out to be.  Groklaw has a habit of doing it too, although PJ has a much more annoying &#039;holier than thou&#039; attitude which i&#039;m fed up with.  Such attacks don&#039;t add any value to this otherwise useful site.

It is nice to see you apologise, but certainly in this case it wouldn&#039;t have taken much research to never have needed to in the first place.

 Michael Zucchi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Roy,</p>
<p>Most people would not want to put who they work for on their personal `blog&#8217; &#8211; for the express reason that it may imply some sort of official/company position.  How you could claim that everyone would normally show their employer on their `blog&#8217; is pretty strange.  There is a difference between &#8216;I work for a company and get paid to blog to support their position in secret&#8217;, and &#8216;I work for a company and love my job and like to talk about all the great stuff I am/we are doing, as well as movies/food/friends/etc&#8217;.</p>
<p>To claim that you didn&#8217;t know Jeff was an employee of Novell does suggest you should do some more research.  Jeff has been involved in Ximian/Novell almost as long as Miguel has.  And not only that, has likewise been very open and very public about it &#8211; posting thousands of e-mails on public lists over the last 8 years for example.  I also know him personally and worked with him for several years and think he&#8217;s a pretty decent bloke who is I know is completely dedicated to free software, and I feel somewhat offended that you are attacking him (and others, such as Miguel &#8211; disagree yes, but why attack?).</p>
<p>I, like others, know you do a lot of jumping to quick conclusions on often poorly researched facts, but tend to forgive you because also coalesce a lot of interesting links and opinion and seem to hold a position on a number of issues that I generally agree with.  However, I do wish you&#8217;d stop these personal attacks &#8211; all they do is upset people who are more complex than you make them out to be.  Groklaw has a habit of doing it too, although PJ has a much more annoying &#8216;holier than thou&#8217; attitude which i&#8217;m fed up with.  Such attacks don&#8217;t add any value to this otherwise useful site.</p>
<p>It is nice to see you apologise, but certainly in this case it wouldn&#8217;t have taken much research to never have needed to in the first place.</p>
<p> Michael Zucchi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slashdot User</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-7/#comment-26651</link>
		<dc:creator>Slashdot User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 01:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26651</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure that the definition is &quot;whatever perception people get from the relationship&quot;. You lose control of that when you allow people like that into your IRC channel and link to their websites.

In all fairness though, and as some people here have commented, it&#039;s difficult for you to counteract accusations of culpability by association, just as it is difficult to ask people not to rush to judgments based solely on perception, because you unfortunately do that a lot, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure that the definition is &#8220;whatever perception people get from the relationship&#8221;. You lose control of that when you allow people like that into your IRC channel and link to their websites.</p>
<p>In all fairness though, and as some people here have commented, it&#8217;s difficult for you to counteract accusations of culpability by association, just as it is difficult to ask people not to rush to judgments based solely on perception, because you unfortunately do that a lot, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-7/#comment-26647</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26647</guid>
		<description>Their definition of friend is &quot;site reader&quot;, whose behaviour in Slashdot I&#039;m strongly against. I&#039;ve always loathed sock-puppeting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their definition of friend is &#8220;site reader&#8221;, whose behaviour in Slashdot I&#8217;m strongly against. I&#8217;ve always loathed sock-puppeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slashdot User</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-7/#comment-26646</link>
		<dc:creator>Slashdot User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26646</guid>
		<description>@Roy -

I apologize if that came across as a personal attack. It wasn&#039;t intended as such at all. I know for a fact you do not remove comments, but if you want, please delete or blank out mine.

I just think it&#039;s a shame that the &quot;Roy has friends that game websites with 14+ accounts&quot; line has now become a sort of punch line for some people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Roy -</p>
<p>I apologize if that came across as a personal attack. It wasn&#8217;t intended as such at all. I know for a fact you do not remove comments, but if you want, please delete or blank out mine.</p>
<p>I just think it&#8217;s a shame that the &#8220;Roy has friends that game websites with 14+ accounts&#8221; line has now become a sort of punch line for some people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-6/#comment-26645</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26645</guid>
		<description>Attacks by associations are cheap and personal attacks are not welcome. Keep them in Slashdot where they belong, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attacks by associations are cheap and personal attacks are not welcome. Keep them in Slashdot where they belong, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slashdot User</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-6/#comment-26644</link>
		<dc:creator>Slashdot User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26644</guid>
		<description>&gt; who, as I understand it, are known to have more than 14 accounts???

Beware of &#039;twitter&#039;, puppet master, nym extraordinaire and legendary Slashdot troll who hangs out on #boycottnovell and does righteous battle with the evil &quot;M$&quot;.

http://slashdot.org/~willyhill/journal/205317

With friends like these...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; who, as I understand it, are known to have more than 14 accounts???</p>
<p>Beware of &#8216;twitter&#8217;, puppet master, nym extraordinaire and legendary Slashdot troll who hangs out on #boycottnovell and does righteous battle with the evil &#8220;M$&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/~willyhill/journal/205317" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/~willyhill/journal/205317</a></p>
<p>With friends like these&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-6/#comment-26615</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26615</guid>
		<description>Really?

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&amp;num=50&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;q=site:boycottnovell.com+byfield</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&#038;num=50&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;q=site:boycottnovell.com+byfield" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=mozclient&#038;num=50&#038;ie=utf-8&#038;oe=utf-8&#038;q=site:boycottnovell.com+byfield</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O'Brian</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/comment-page-6/#comment-26614</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 23:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/09/shopping-for-mono-protection/#comment-26614</guid>
		<description>The difference between Bruce Byfield&#039;s mistake and your bountiful number of mistakes is that his isn&#039;t trying to vilify anyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between Bruce Byfield&#8217;s mistake and your bountiful number of mistakes is that his isn&#8217;t trying to vilify anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

