<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silver Lie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-4/#comment-27990</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27990</guid>
		<description>Using the European championship to spread malware
http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3509</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the European championship to spread malware<br />
<a href="http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3509" rel="nofollow">http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/3509</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-4/#comment-27989</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27989</guid>
		<description>@Ziggyfish: it runs sandboxed and without the ability to access native code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ziggyfish: it runs sandboxed and without the ability to access native code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggyfish</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-27988</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziggyfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27988</guid>
		<description>AlexH, I&#039;m more worried about the viruses that Silverlight can spread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AlexH, I&#8217;m more worried about the viruses that Silverlight can spread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-27934</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27934</guid>
		<description>I doubt very much you have any idea what the support in Moonlight is actually like, but in any event I don&#039;t use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt very much you have any idea what the support in Moonlight is actually like, but in any event I don&#8217;t use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-27932</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27932</guid>
		<description>Enjoy XAML. Just don&#039;t use on GNU/Linux because you&#039;ll be terribly disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoy XAML. Just don&#8217;t use on GNU/Linux because you&#8217;ll be terribly disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-27929</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27929</guid>
		<description>Sure, but what?

SVG + JS + bits is one possibility, but animation, sound and video support is terribly weak, and it&#039;s not clear that many parts of the SVG standard are ever going to be implemented.

Flash is another, but it&#039;s not really a specified standard and doing a binary format in 2008 is a bit of a strange decision.

There&#039;s MPEG / SMIL, but eh, there are some _real_ patent problems.

Potentially you could try to do something with &quot;Ajax&quot;, but the experience of OpenLaszlo is that it&#039;s a. extremely difficult and b. error-prone. HTML just isn&#039;t designed to do that kind of thing, it&#039;s not a &quot;pixel-perfect&quot; format (and I&#039;m not sure anyone really wants it to be?). It&#039;s also not a standard - the solution would use standard technologies, but would have to exist at a much higher level. HTML is like OpenDocument, Flash/Silverlight is like PDF - very different systems.

It&#039;s very easy to say &quot;there should be a standard&quot; or something, but the free software community just hasn&#039;t done anything in this area. We&#039;re still trying to catch up to simply *play back* existing Flash content.

I would quite happily use something like Silverlight, even if it wasn&#039;t nearly as advanced and didn&#039;t work in IE, if there were decent content tools. The market here is absolutely massive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but what?</p>
<p>SVG + JS + bits is one possibility, but animation, sound and video support is terribly weak, and it&#8217;s not clear that many parts of the SVG standard are ever going to be implemented.</p>
<p>Flash is another, but it&#8217;s not really a specified standard and doing a binary format in 2008 is a bit of a strange decision.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s MPEG / SMIL, but eh, there are some _real_ patent problems.</p>
<p>Potentially you could try to do something with &#8220;Ajax&#8221;, but the experience of OpenLaszlo is that it&#8217;s a. extremely difficult and b. error-prone. HTML just isn&#8217;t designed to do that kind of thing, it&#8217;s not a &#8220;pixel-perfect&#8221; format (and I&#8217;m not sure anyone really wants it to be?). It&#8217;s also not a standard &#8211; the solution would use standard technologies, but would have to exist at a much higher level. HTML is like OpenDocument, Flash/Silverlight is like PDF &#8211; very different systems.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very easy to say &#8220;there should be a standard&#8221; or something, but the free software community just hasn&#8217;t done anything in this area. We&#8217;re still trying to catch up to simply *play back* existing Flash content.</p>
<p>I would quite happily use something like Silverlight, even if it wasn&#8217;t nearly as advanced and didn&#8217;t work in IE, if there were decent content tools. The market here is absolutely massive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O'Brian</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-3/#comment-27928</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27928</guid>
		<description>Then get crackin&#039; Roy, time&#039;s a wastin&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then get crackin&#8217; Roy, time&#8217;s a wastin&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-27921</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27921</guid>
		<description>The output needs to be something standard though... as in Web standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The output needs to be something standard though&#8230; as in Web standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-27920</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27920</guid>
		<description>Um, the point is that they are looking into that, they&#039;re developing a content creation tool for Eclipse :D

It&#039;s hardly wheel re-invention when there is nothing else out there doing that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, the point is that they are looking into that, they&#8217;re developing a content creation tool for Eclipse <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hardly wheel re-invention when there is nothing else out there doing that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-27919</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27919</guid>
		<description>Developers who waste their time reinventing the wheel (Silverlight) might want to look into that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Developers who waste their time reinventing the wheel (Silverlight) might want to look into that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-27918</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27918</guid>
		<description>I know how it works (although I will disagree with you about the practicality of developing against e.g. SVG; it&#039;s nothing like mature enough even if you&#039;re willing to ignore IE).

The point is that there are no tools for people to develop these things; you have to code them up from scratch/against frameworks in text editors. When you&#039;re doing anything vaguely visual, it&#039;s &quot;tough&quot; to say the least. So, take SVG: how would you animate a character in SVG? What tool would you use to do that, even a simple waving stick figure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know how it works (although I will disagree with you about the practicality of developing against e.g. SVG; it&#8217;s nothing like mature enough even if you&#8217;re willing to ignore IE).</p>
<p>The point is that there are no tools for people to develop these things; you have to code them up from scratch/against frameworks in text editors. When you&#8217;re doing anything vaguely visual, it&#8217;s &#8220;tough&#8221; to say the least. So, take SVG: how would you animate a character in SVG? What tool would you use to do that, even a simple waving stick figure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-2/#comment-27917</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27917</guid>
		<description>You can achieve many of the same things with JS, SVG (which only Microsoft snubs), CSS3 (where Microsoft was lagging), and Ogg (which a former Microsoft employee fought out of HTML5).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can achieve many of the same things with JS, SVG (which only Microsoft snubs), CSS3 (where Microsoft was lagging), and Ogg (which a former Microsoft employee fought out of HTML5).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-27916</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27916</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not talking about frameworks; there is code to do most things. The problem is that there are no content creation tools.

It&#039;s all very well to say that some &quot;heavy lifting&quot; is required: my point is that Microsoft are the ones currently doing it (as free software and in Java, no less). I don&#039;t see anything equivalent even vaguely on the horizon for Ajax or any other system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not talking about frameworks; there is code to do most things. The problem is that there are no content creation tools.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all very well to say that some &#8220;heavy lifting&#8221; is required: my point is that Microsoft are the ones currently doing it (as free software and in Java, no less). I don&#8217;t see anything equivalent even vaguely on the horizon for Ajax or any other system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-27915</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27915</guid>
		<description>There are quite a few user-friendly &#039;Ajax&#039; frameworks that I am familiar with. Some are open source too. 

For content to be available through standards, as opposed to through a universal blob*, more work might be needed. The Web and the Free software movement were not built without some heavy lifting.

__
*Curl and JavaFX being a slight exception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are quite a few user-friendly &#8216;Ajax&#8217; frameworks that I am familiar with. Some are open source too. </p>
<p>For content to be available through standards, as opposed to through a universal blob*, more work might be needed. The Web and the Free software movement were not built without some heavy lifting.</p>
<p>__<br />
*Curl and JavaFX being a slight exception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-27912</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27912</guid>
		<description>Well, &quot;Ajax&quot; is ill-defined and not particularly informative - there is no one thing which is &quot;Ajax&quot;; you could describe any combination of HTML/Javascript/other stuff as that.

But anyway, take your point - where are the Ajax content creation tools? As far as I can see, even with the likes of Dijit, people are still having to code up interfaces from scratch, test them in different browsers, work around different bugs.

The closest other free software technology we have is probably XUL. But again, no tools for that either :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, &#8220;Ajax&#8221; is ill-defined and not particularly informative &#8211; there is no one thing which is &#8220;Ajax&#8221;; you could describe any combination of HTML/Javascript/other stuff as that.</p>
<p>But anyway, take your point &#8211; where are the Ajax content creation tools? As far as I can see, even with the likes of Dijit, people are still having to code up interfaces from scratch, test them in different browsers, work around different bugs.</p>
<p>The closest other free software technology we have is probably XUL. But again, no tools for that either <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-27908</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27908</guid>
		<description>Who said anything about Flash? Is Ajax chopped liver now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said anything about Flash? Is Ajax chopped liver now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-27902</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/10/16/silverlight-lies-revisited/#comment-27902</guid>
		<description>If people want to put up a different option to Silverlight, the lack of content creation tools needs to be addressed. Free software users are not passive consumers, and if it&#039;s easiest to create Silverlight content on free platforms with Eclipse, I don&#039;t see many people slaving away at command-line Flash or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If people want to put up a different option to Silverlight, the lack of content creation tools needs to be addressed. Free software users are not passive consumers, and if it&#8217;s easiest to create Silverlight content on free platforms with Eclipse, I don&#8217;t see many people slaving away at command-line Flash or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

