<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novell Pressures SCO for Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/comment-page-2/#comment-33830</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-33830</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still curious about it, but there&#039;s almost no way it can carry on without a noticeable leak.

Then again, see this portion of the IRC log from last night:

http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/08/irc-log-07112008/#tNov%2007%2019:11:58</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still curious about it, but there&#8217;s almost no way it can carry on without a noticeable leak.</p>
<p>Then again, see this portion of the IRC log from last night:</p>
<p><a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/08/irc-log-07112008/#tNov%2007%2019:11:58" rel="nofollow">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/08/irc-log-07112008/#tNov%2007%2019:11:58</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/comment-page-1/#comment-33823</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-33823</guid>
		<description>Um, it really makes no sense whatsoever for Microsoft to use Linux as a Unix under everything when *BSD is just as stable, almost as good for drivers and has a proprietisable licence. Just think what a version of Windows Microsoft could do starting from OpenBSD and Wine ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, it really makes no sense whatsoever for Microsoft to use Linux as a Unix under everything when *BSD is just as stable, almost as good for drivers and has a proprietisable licence. Just think what a version of Windows Microsoft could do starting from OpenBSD and Wine &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/comment-page-1/#comment-32362</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-32362</guid>
		<description>They didn&#039;t. SCO is facing a court battle against Novell. Here is the latest:

&lt;h3&gt;Novell Responds to SCO&#039;s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal/Final Judgment Language&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&quot;Novell has filed its Response to SCO&#039;s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. It&#039;s ascerbic and funny as can be. It shows the court each and every tricky bit it thinks SCO might just be angling for.&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&quot;I saw in the email exchange between the SCO and Novell attorneys that were attached to the David Melaugh Declaration that SCO has stepped on Novell&#039;s last nerve with its trickiness. And here we see the result. Novell points out each and every conceivable thing SCO might be trying for, leaving nothing for SCO to try later.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081101154055795</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They didn&#8217;t. SCO is facing a court battle against Novell. Here is the latest:</p>
<h3>Novell Responds to SCO&#8217;s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal/Final Judgment Language</h3>
<p><em>&#8220;Novell has filed its Response to SCO&#8217;s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. It&#8217;s ascerbic and funny as can be. It shows the court each and every tricky bit it thinks SCO might just be angling for.</em></p>
<p><em>&#8220;I saw in the email exchange between the SCO and Novell attorneys that were attached to the David Melaugh Declaration that SCO has stepped on Novell&#8217;s last nerve with its trickiness. And here we see the result. Novell points out each and every conceivable thing SCO might be trying for, leaving nothing for SCO to try later.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081101154055795" rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081101154055795</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincent</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/comment-page-1/#comment-32359</link>
		<dc:creator>vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-32359</guid>
		<description>Why did Novell buy SCO Group ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did Novell buy SCO Group ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/comment-page-1/#comment-32345</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-32345</guid>
		<description>Bubba,

I highly doubt it, but who did you hear this from? Was it a credible source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bubba,</p>
<p>I highly doubt it, but who did you hear this from? Was it a credible source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/comment-page-1/#comment-32336</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/01/novl-pressures-scox/#comment-32336</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I just heard that Novell is designing the OS for Windows 7.  I live in Provo Utah and heard it from an insider that Novell is designing it w/ a flavor of Linux.  I guess that M$ even admits that NT is loaded w/ security and stability issues.

I am not sure if this is true, but it would not surprise me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I just heard that Novell is designing the OS for Windows 7.  I live in Provo Utah and heard it from an insider that Novell is designing it w/ a flavor of Linux.  I guess that M$ even admits that NT is loaded w/ security and stability issues.</p>
<p>I am not sure if this is true, but it would not surprise me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

