<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novell is Losing the Few Supporters It Had Left</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2008/11/15/novell-black-widow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/15/novell-black-widow/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/15/novell-black-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-36576</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 09:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/15/novell-black-widow/#comment-36576</guid>
		<description>I beg to disagree. I wish to show that unlike some journalists who covered this, readers are dissatisfied with what Novell had done. These reader have nothing to do with this campaign as far as I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to disagree. I wish to show that unlike some journalists who covered this, readers are dissatisfied with what Novell had done. These reader have nothing to do with this campaign as far as I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Razuri</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2008/11/15/novell-black-widow/comment-page-1/#comment-36490</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Razuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2008/11/15/novell-black-widow/#comment-36490</guid>
		<description>No offense, but given the recent goings on around here it seems a tad disingenuous to work up articles about comments posted in other websites.

Just saying it doesn&#039;t look particularly good *shrug*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No offense, but given the recent goings on around here it seems a tad disingenuous to work up articles about comments posted in other websites.</p>
<p>Just saying it doesn&#8217;t look particularly good *shrug*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

