<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hard Week for Microsoft, Next Week Likely Harder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O'Brian</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-10/#comment-57777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57777</guid>
		<description>His faulty intepretation of the &quot;Linux Heat Map&quot; is a great example. His lack of understanding in this article is yet another.

The list is endless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His faulty intepretation of the &#8220;Linux Heat Map&#8221; is a great example. His lack of understanding in this article is yet another.</p>
<p>The list is endless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-9/#comment-57771</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57771</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure he can make something up if you give him a few minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure he can make something up if you give him a few minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-9/#comment-57770</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57770</guid>
		<description>Dan,

Your message lacks content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,</p>
<p>Your message lacks content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O'Brian</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-9/#comment-57769</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57769</guid>
		<description>Roy: go out and get some real-world experience, please, before you further humiliate yourself.

Actually, on second thought, it&#039;s more funny if you don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roy: go out and get some real-world experience, please, before you further humiliate yourself.</p>
<p>Actually, on second thought, it&#8217;s more funny if you don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-9/#comment-57768</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57768</guid>
		<description>Which memes? Be specific, please. Subsidy of entry does not mean that a product will not generate a loss throughout its lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which memes? Be specific, please. Subsidy of entry does not mean that a product will not generate a loss throughout its lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-9/#comment-57767</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57767</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not pedancy, Roy. You can&#039;t redefine &quot;profitability&quot; to your own term just because it suits your argument.

This is a classic example of what I&#039;m saying. Microsoft (and, to a lesser extent, Sony) have massively subsidized their entry into this market. That&#039;s fair enough criticism.

But then you over-egg the pudding by basically padding it with fabrication. You repeat old memes which are no longer true, and meddle around with words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not pedancy, Roy. You can&#8217;t redefine &#8220;profitability&#8221; to your own term just because it suits your argument.</p>
<p>This is a classic example of what I&#8217;m saying. Microsoft (and, to a lesser extent, Sony) have massively subsidized their entry into this market. That&#8217;s fair enough criticism.</p>
<p>But then you over-egg the pudding by basically padding it with fabrication. You repeat old memes which are no longer true, and meddle around with words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-8/#comment-57766</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57766</guid>
		<description>&#039;Pedancy&#039; with literal meanings does not change the fact it is a piker from a financial perspective,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Pedancy&#8217; with literal meanings does not change the fact it is a piker from a financial perspective,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-8/#comment-57765</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57765</guid>
		<description>As I just said, the concept of profitability is not a cumulative one for obvious reasons. No-one measures it like that. 

Call it spin if you like; it&#039;s actually Finance 101. Go read how actual accountants do this, Roy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I just said, the concept of profitability is not a cumulative one for obvious reasons. No-one measures it like that. </p>
<p>Call it spin if you like; it&#8217;s actually Finance 101. Go read how actual accountants do this, Roy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-8/#comment-57764</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57764</guid>
		<description>You are attempting to spin this.

Let me simplify this. Let us say that Microsoft&#039;s balance-sheet for XBox looks like this:

2000: -$1,000,000
2001: -$1,500,000
2002: -$1,400,000
2003: -$2,000,000
2004: -$2,000,000
2005: -$2,500,000
2006: -$4,000,000
2007: -$7,500,000
2008: -$7,200,000
2009: ?? (2009 depression)

Does that look like a successful and profitable business?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are attempting to spin this.</p>
<p>Let me simplify this. Let us say that Microsoft&#8217;s balance-sheet for XBox looks like this:</p>
<p>2000: -$1,000,000<br />
2001: -$1,500,000<br />
2002: -$1,400,000<br />
2003: -$2,000,000<br />
2004: -$2,000,000<br />
2005: -$2,500,000<br />
2006: -$4,000,000<br />
2007: -$7,500,000<br />
2008: -$7,200,000<br />
2009: ?? (2009 depression)</p>
<p>Does that look like a successful and profitable business?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-8/#comment-57763</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57763</guid>
		<description>Actually, it does. Profitability is over a financial period, not the entire lifetime of any given product. By your logic, Windows will be a profitable product basically forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it does. Profitability is over a financial period, not the entire lifetime of any given product. By your logic, Windows will be a profitable product basically forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-8/#comment-57762</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57762</guid>
		<description>They are not profitable. They have lost about $7 billion. They are at the point now where they no longer lose even &lt;em&gt;more&lt;/em&gt; money (that&#039;s what they claim anyway), but it doesn&#039;t make them &quot;profitable&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are not profitable. They have lost about $7 billion. They are at the point now where they no longer lose even <em>more</em> money (that&#8217;s what they claim anyway), but it doesn&#8217;t make them &#8220;profitable&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-7/#comment-57761</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57761</guid>
		<description>Not being #1 doesn&#039;t make it unsuccessful. Having a huge installed base, a lot of subscribers, and a profitable business counts as &quot;success&quot; (and they are profitable now).

You write Microsoft off at your peril. Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being #1 doesn&#8217;t make it unsuccessful. Having a huge installed base, a lot of subscribers, and a profitable business counts as &#8220;success&#8221; (and they are profitable now).</p>
<p>You write Microsoft off at your peril. Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-7/#comment-57759</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57759</guid>
		<description>Ballmer himself calls XBox a &quot;funny product&quot; because they&#039;ve lost billions on it. How do you define success? Number of adverts?

The only winner is Nintendo, which Microsoft prefers to pretend does not exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ballmer himself calls XBox a &#8220;funny product&#8221; because they&#8217;ve lost billions on it. How do you define success? Number of adverts?</p>
<p>The only winner is Nintendo, which Microsoft prefers to pretend does not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-7/#comment-57758</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57758</guid>
		<description>The XBox360 isn&#039;t failing in anyone&#039;s eyes except yours, because you still repeat the &quot;loss on every sale&quot; meme, which as has been pointed out isn&#039;t true any more.

But I articulated my point many comments ago: you criticise Microsoft for many things. Some of them are entirely justifiable, and deserve wider notice. But then you pepper it with nonsense about CSS vendor extensions or (in this case) claiming back their own property, and start calling them names.

By making bad points you drown out the good ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The XBox360 isn&#8217;t failing in anyone&#8217;s eyes except yours, because you still repeat the &#8220;loss on every sale&#8221; meme, which as has been pointed out isn&#8217;t true any more.</p>
<p>But I articulated my point many comments ago: you criticise Microsoft for many things. Some of them are entirely justifiable, and deserve wider notice. But then you pepper it with nonsense about CSS vendor extensions or (in this case) claiming back their own property, and start calling them names.</p>
<p>By making bad points you drown out the good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-7/#comment-57757</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57757</guid>
		<description>Of who? Woolworths? There is no criticism there; this part is pointing out that XBox360 is failing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of who? Woolworths? There is no criticism there; this part is pointing out that XBox360 is failing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-7/#comment-57756</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57756</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing out the main point, which isn&#039;t about your mistakes. It&#039;s the made-up criticism that&#039;s the big problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing out the main point, which isn&#8217;t about your mistakes. It&#8217;s the made-up criticism that&#8217;s the big problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-6/#comment-57755</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57755</guid>
		<description>If you are a perfectionist, use an encyclopedia or contribute to Wikipedia. If my source says that “...Amidst the announcement that Woolworths would be shutting down due to bankruptcy,&quot; then I am allowed to innocently propagate an error every now and then.

I write many posts here. Precision is hard when some of the articles from Google News are erroneous.

If you have a nitpicking hobby, start a(nother) blog and express your point of view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are a perfectionist, use an encyclopedia or contribute to Wikipedia. If my source says that “&#8230;Amidst the announcement that Woolworths would be shutting down due to bankruptcy,&#8221; then I am allowed to innocently propagate an error every now and then.</p>
<p>I write many posts here. Precision is hard when some of the articles from Google News are erroneous.</p>
<p>If you have a nitpicking hobby, start a(nother) blog and express your point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-6/#comment-57754</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57754</guid>
		<description>No, it&#039;s not the nitpicking, it&#039;s watching the revisionism in action - how far you&#039;ll bend to not admit a mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s not the nitpicking, it&#8217;s watching the revisionism in action &#8211; how far you&#8217;ll bend to not admit a mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-6/#comment-57753</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57753</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t want to use &lt;strike&gt;strikeout&lt;/strike&gt; but rather just to clarify.

Do you really have nothing better to comment on? I&#039;ve posted some interesting things, but nitpicking appeals to you much more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t want to use <strike>strikeout</strike> but rather just to clarify.</p>
<p>Do you really have nothing better to comment on? I&#8217;ve posted some interesting things, but nitpicking appeals to you much more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexH</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/comment-page-6/#comment-57752</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/07/hard-week-for-microsoft/#comment-57752</guid>
		<description>The simpler fix would be to cross out &quot;they&quot; and put &quot;Woolworths&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The simpler fix would be to cross out &#8220;they&#8221; and put &#8220;Woolworths&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

