<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux Magazine and Novell: Conflict of Interests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-57940</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/#comment-57940</guid>
		<description>Well, Cisco is a massive GPL violator and Citrix is still serving Microsoft 24/7.

It must be spring. April 1st comes early to Linux Magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Cisco is a massive GPL violator and Citrix is still serving Microsoft 24/7.</p>
<p>It must be spring. April 1st comes early to Linux Magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Soliz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-57938</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Soliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/#comment-57938</guid>
		<description>I was going to point this out, just found it.

It is crazy

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Almost forgot. How come Red Hat and Canonical aren’t included? 
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7221
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Maybe this article is quite right, and we need to &lt;i&gt;watch out for&lt;/i&gt; these companies, maybe the article is actually a warning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to point this out, just found it.</p>
<p>It is crazy</p>
<blockquote><p>
Almost forgot. How come Red Hat and Canonical aren’t included?<br />
<a href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7221" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7221</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe this article is quite right, and we need to <i>watch out for</i> these companies, maybe the article is actually a warning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-57937</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/#comment-57937</guid>
		<description>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7221

&quot;Once again — with remarkable clarity — we peer into our crystal ball and pick which companies in and around open source are going to grab your attention in 2009&quot;

(They even did a press release about this gut feeling outburst)

&quot;IBM, Citrix, Cisco, Novell, Microsoft, Terracotta, Dell, Zimory, Check Point, Astaro, Likewise Software, Open-Xchange, Coraid, Parallels, VMware, Hyperic, ScaleMP, NetGear...&quot;

One reader tells us: &quot;Citrix: is more purely Open Source with its XenServer, based on the Xen hypervisor [...] Cisco: leveraging Linux as a platform for developers with their ISR routers [...] Odd there, no mention of Red Hat or Canonical [...] who owns/runs Linux Mag?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7221" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7221</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Once again — with remarkable clarity — we peer into our crystal ball and pick which companies in and around open source are going to grab your attention in 2009&#8243;</p>
<p>(They even did a press release about this gut feeling outburst)</p>
<p>&#8220;IBM, Citrix, Cisco, Novell, Microsoft, Terracotta, Dell, Zimory, Check Point, Astaro, Likewise Software, Open-Xchange, Coraid, Parallels, VMware, Hyperic, ScaleMP, NetGear&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>One reader tells us: &#8220;Citrix: is more purely Open Source with its XenServer, based on the Xen hypervisor [...] Cisco: leveraging Linux as a platform for developers with their ISR routers [...] Odd there, no mention of Red Hat or Canonical [...] who owns/runs Linux Mag?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Soliz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/comment-page-1/#comment-57935</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Soliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/09/novell-press-conflict-of-interests/#comment-57935</guid>
		<description>Cut these guys some slack already. You got to accept that &quot;Novell employee names Novell as one of the top 20  companies to watch in 2009&quot; was a very bad header.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut these guys some slack already. You got to accept that &#8220;Novell employee names Novell as one of the top 20  companies to watch in 2009&#8243; was a very bad header.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

