<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TomTom CEO Explains Why Patents Are Waste of Time, Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-58518</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/#comment-58518</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t buy TomTom, either. ;-)

It uses the Linux kernel but totally snubs GNU/Linux users. There is also some gpl-violations history, but that&#039;s resolved AFAIK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t buy TomTom, either. <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It uses the Linux kernel but totally snubs GNU/Linux users. There is also some gpl-violations history, but that&#8217;s resolved AFAIK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DOUGman</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-58517</link>
		<dc:creator>DOUGman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/#comment-58517</guid>
		<description>&quot;I remember clearly in 2005, we spent more money on patent disputes, patent fights than all our technology development put together.”

WOW.... thats just crazy.... I would not be a stock holder, after hearinf those words.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I remember clearly in 2005, we spent more money on patent disputes, patent fights than all our technology development put together.”</p>
<p>WOW&#8230;. thats just crazy&#8230;. I would not be a stock holder, after hearinf those words.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-58516</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/#comment-58516</guid>
		<description>IBM is living in a bubble (or a patent closet) and it&#039;s afraid that people will find out that it&#039;s naked.

These things are imaginary properties and the economic slump proved they are risky to rely on.

It makes a nice tune to the investors though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM is living in a bubble (or a patent closet) and it&#8217;s afraid that people will find out that it&#8217;s naked.</p>
<p>These things are imaginary properties and the economic slump proved they are risky to rely on.</p>
<p>It makes a nice tune to the investors though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Coyle</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-58515</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 00:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/14/tomtom-ceo-on-patents/#comment-58515</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/26471.wss&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IBM apparently hasn&#039;t reached the conclusion that patents are a waste of time and money&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;blockquote&gt;
  IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced that it earned 4,186 U.S. patents in 2008, becoming the first company ever to earn more than 4,000 U.S. patents in a single year. IBM&#039;s 2008 patent issuances are nearly triple Hewlett-Packard&#039;s and exceed the issuances of Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Apple, EMC, Accenture and Google -- combined.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For context, they more than doubled up #4 Microsoft - 4186 to 2030.

Then, they go on to say they&#039;ll increase 50% the number of inventions they publish without seeking patents, in order to really underscore the schizophrenic approach IBM has taken publicly towards patents over the last few years, imo.

IBM, of course sees it slightly differently:
&lt;blockquote&gt;
While IBM will continue to seek patents and will protect its intellectual property, its planned increase in publishing inventions will focus on those technology areas that will increase the build out of a new, smarter infrastructure. The evolution of IBM&#039;s policy builds on prior efforts to stimulate innovation by pledging not to assert certain patent rights in the area of open source software, health care, education, the environment, and software interoperability.


&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/26471.wss" rel="nofollow">IBM apparently hasn&#8217;t reached the conclusion that patents are a waste of time and money</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
  IBM (NYSE: IBM) today announced that it earned 4,186 U.S. patents in 2008, becoming the first company ever to earn more than 4,000 U.S. patents in a single year. IBM&#8217;s 2008 patent issuances are nearly triple Hewlett-Packard&#8217;s and exceed the issuances of Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Apple, EMC, Accenture and Google &#8212; combined.
</p></blockquote>
<p>For context, they more than doubled up #4 Microsoft &#8211; 4186 to 2030.</p>
<p>Then, they go on to say they&#8217;ll increase 50% the number of inventions they publish without seeking patents, in order to really underscore the schizophrenic approach IBM has taken publicly towards patents over the last few years, imo.</p>
<p>IBM, of course sees it slightly differently:</p>
<blockquote><p>
While IBM will continue to seek patents and will protect its intellectual property, its planned increase in publishing inventions will focus on those technology areas that will increase the build out of a new, smarter infrastructure. The evolution of IBM&#8217;s policy builds on prior efforts to stimulate innovation by pledging not to assert certain patent rights in the area of open source software, health care, education, the environment, and software interoperability.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

