<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Adopts Malware Techniques to Advance .NET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-5/#comment-59421</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59421</guid>
		<description>@Brian,

Thanks. Yes, I linked to http://www.getgnulinux.org/ earlier on in a post and earlier today I also thought about doing what Groklaw did, probably in our Wiki.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian,</p>
<p>Thanks. Yes, I linked to <a href="http://www.getgnulinux.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.getgnulinux.org/</a> earlier on in a post and earlier today I also thought about doing what Groklaw did, probably in our Wiki.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Assaf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-4/#comment-59418</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Assaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59418</guid>
		<description>Go for it Roy. 

I stumbled upon this site in a blog comment somewhere:

http://www.getgnulinux.org/

Looks very nice, and is quite simple to peruse. Recommends Ubuntu, Fedora, and gnewsense. I figure your site would not want to advocate SUSE. ;)

Also, groklaw has a &quot;switch to Linux&quot; link on the side of the main page.

http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2006061302494935

It may indeed be worth while for boycottnovell to offer something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go for it Roy. </p>
<p>I stumbled upon this site in a blog comment somewhere:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.getgnulinux.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.getgnulinux.org/</a></p>
<p>Looks very nice, and is quite simple to peruse. Recommends Ubuntu, Fedora, and gnewsense. I figure your site would not want to advocate SUSE. <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Also, groklaw has a &#8220;switch to Linux&#8221; link on the side of the main page.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2006061302494935" rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2006061302494935</a></p>
<p>It may indeed be worth while for boycottnovell to offer something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Coyle</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-4/#comment-59408</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59408</guid>
		<description>SueMe had died, I don&#039;t remember what it was based upon - probably Slackware or Gentoo - the main point of the site was it was &#039;Disclosing your Balance Sheet Liabilities&#039;, and prominently displayed Microsoft&#039;s FUD claims regarding the number of their patents infringed by GNU/Linux systems right on the frontpage.

That being said, it was fully functional, even if patent encumbered ;^ ).  The domain was jettisoned during a financial crisis, (we had kept all of the boycott____ names, but I couldn&#039;t afford &#039;em all...)

If there really is a desire, we could certainly spin something new up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SueMe had died, I don&#8217;t remember what it was based upon &#8211; probably Slackware or Gentoo &#8211; the main point of the site was it was &#8216;Disclosing your Balance Sheet Liabilities&#8217;, and prominently displayed Microsoft&#8217;s FUD claims regarding the number of their patents infringed by GNU/Linux systems right on the frontpage.</p>
<p>That being said, it was fully functional, even if patent encumbered ;^ ).  The domain was jettisoned during a financial crisis, (we had kept all of the boycott____ names, but I couldn&#8217;t afford &#8216;em all&#8230;)</p>
<p>If there really is a desire, we could certainly spin something new up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-4/#comment-59407</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 14:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59407</guid>
		<description>The main post is &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2007/06/14/no-longer-vaporware-sueme-linux/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, but the domain name was cyber-jacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main post is <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2007/06/14/no-longer-vaporware-sueme-linux/" rel="nofollow">here</a>, but the domain name was cyber-jacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-4/#comment-59403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59403</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Thanks a lot... I should have clicked before assuming you were a decent human being with tact. Thanks a lot.

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Thanks a lot&#8230; I should have clicked before assuming you were a decent human being with tact. Thanks a lot.</p>
<p> <img src='http://techrights.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-4/#comment-59402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59402</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think Shane mentioned recently something along those lines.

Where is the download button or torrent? What features does it have? How was it put together? I&#039;m interested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think Shane mentioned recently something along those lines.</p>
<p>Where is the download button or torrent? What features does it have? How was it put together? I&#8217;m interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-3/#comment-59398</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59398</guid>
		<description>Shane has already created &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2006/12/25/our-own-distro-sueme-linux/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SueMe Linux&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shane has already created <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2006/12/25/our-own-distro-sueme-linux/" rel="nofollow">SueMe Linux</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-3/#comment-59397</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59397</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; something that says “get GNU/Linux”?

It might be more fitting to recommend actual branded distros as well.. of course, distros whose patronage would be a positive to the wider Linux community (vs say to Microsoft).

A distro rotation could be used, perhaps alongside the ads. Maybe even offer limited free ad space to distros where they can put their own messages. And I&#039;m not insinuating that generic GNU/Linux should not be in the mix.

Boycottnovell could have its own distro. I know I have brought this up before (on irc), but I haven&#039;t yet gotten myself into a position to get back to technical work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; something that says “get GNU/Linux”?</p>
<p>It might be more fitting to recommend actual branded distros as well.. of course, distros whose patronage would be a positive to the wider Linux community (vs say to Microsoft).</p>
<p>A distro rotation could be used, perhaps alongside the ads. Maybe even offer limited free ad space to distros where they can put their own messages. And I&#8217;m not insinuating that generic GNU/Linux should not be in the mix.</p>
<p>Boycottnovell could have its own distro. I know I have brought this up before (on irc), but I haven&#8217;t yet gotten myself into a position to get back to technical work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-3/#comment-59390</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59390</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. Someone raised a similar point before. Should we maybe add a banner somewhere in all pages... something that says &quot;get GNU/Linux&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. Someone raised a similar point before. Should we maybe add a banner somewhere in all pages&#8230; something that says &#8220;get GNU/Linux&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Assaf</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-3/#comment-59389</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Assaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 08:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to field this question. 

Installation instructions for GNU/Linux and advocacy belongs in a separate article than a Windows worm and patch.

If a Windows user wants to switch OS&#039;s based on viruses/malware/security (in that case there would be very few users still on Windows) it would make sense to provide that as an obvious solution. 

But really, why not post a link to the articles in question? 

Maybe the author isn&#039;t familiar with Linux, but wanted to be accurate and not imply it effects all PCs, just PC&#039;s with Windows installed.

Perhaps the mere mention of Linux will have someone use Google (which runs on that very thing) and google &quot;Linux&quot;

If the article provides comments, such as this one, why not just mention it.
 
&quot;I use Ubuntu Linux, go to ubuntu.com&quot;
The site itself has a tour, and simple overview.

I don&#039;t think a paragraph in an article about another OS entirely would be satisfactory in the least. 

Not only that, many Linux distros can be burned to disc or copied to USB and booted from. Even without an install, so it really is necessary to point someone to a detailed and focused article on that.

P.S. I would prefer honestly to never insult Windows or Microsoft products in general. But, MS has resorted to dirty tactics, and with the current lock-in and social inertia, sometimes you just have to point out just how it is, so that some will say: 

&quot;Hey, why am I running this crap, I should check out an alternative&quot;. 

I assure you there are happy Windows users with hijacked boxes, filled with malware, cracked software, DRM (i.e. WGA or Vista in general) just unaware of it. 
That may just be the push to get him or her to try something that isn&#039;t frankly, an insulting OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to field this question. </p>
<p>Installation instructions for GNU/Linux and advocacy belongs in a separate article than a Windows worm and patch.</p>
<p>If a Windows user wants to switch OS&#8217;s based on viruses/malware/security (in that case there would be very few users still on Windows) it would make sense to provide that as an obvious solution. </p>
<p>But really, why not post a link to the articles in question? </p>
<p>Maybe the author isn&#8217;t familiar with Linux, but wanted to be accurate and not imply it effects all PCs, just PC&#8217;s with Windows installed.</p>
<p>Perhaps the mere mention of Linux will have someone use Google (which runs on that very thing) and google &#8220;Linux&#8221;</p>
<p>If the article provides comments, such as this one, why not just mention it.</p>
<p>&#8220;I use Ubuntu Linux, go to ubuntu.com&#8221;<br />
The site itself has a tour, and simple overview.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think a paragraph in an article about another OS entirely would be satisfactory in the least. </p>
<p>Not only that, many Linux distros can be burned to disc or copied to USB and booted from. Even without an install, so it really is necessary to point someone to a detailed and focused article on that.</p>
<p>P.S. I would prefer honestly to never insult Windows or Microsoft products in general. But, MS has resorted to dirty tactics, and with the current lock-in and social inertia, sometimes you just have to point out just how it is, so that some will say: </p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, why am I running this crap, I should check out an alternative&#8221;. </p>
<p>I assure you there are happy Windows users with hijacked boxes, filled with malware, cracked software, DRM (i.e. WGA or Vista in general) just unaware of it.<br />
That may just be the push to get him or her to try something that isn&#8217;t frankly, an insulting OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Norrie</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-3/#comment-59338</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Norrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59338</guid>
		<description>Dear Roy,

Then why do I find that the average news article about Conficker if it says &#039;if you have a Linux sytstem, you are not affected&#039; and then goes on to tell you how to use an anti-viral ptach or program to avoid that infection and doesn&#039;t give you precise help to put Linux on your compuer (of whatever variety!)

Charles</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Roy,</p>
<p>Then why do I find that the average news article about Conficker if it says &#8216;if you have a Linux sytstem, you are not affected&#8217; and then goes on to tell you how to use an anti-viral ptach or program to avoid that infection and doesn&#8217;t give you precise help to put Linux on your compuer (of whatever variety!)</p>
<p>Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-2/#comment-59337</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59337</guid>
		<description>Pro-FOSS/Linux articles by far outweigh analyses and criticisms, but we cover them daily in the form of links with snippets.

Attacks on FOSS are a higher priority because they are a greater barrier to adoption than many other factors combined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro-FOSS/Linux articles by far outweigh analyses and criticisms, but we cover them daily in the form of links with snippets.</p>
<p>Attacks on FOSS are a higher priority because they are a greater barrier to adoption than many other factors combined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-2/#comment-59336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59336</guid>
		<description>Charles, boycottnovell actually does include lots of news links to Linux. Even if it didn&#039;t, I don&#039;t really see your point. It&#039;s not like if a browser can&#039;t go to more than one Linux website on the same day. Switch your browser, btw, if you are encountering that limitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, boycottnovell actually does include lots of news links to Linux. Even if it didn&#8217;t, I don&#8217;t really see your point. It&#8217;s not like if a browser can&#8217;t go to more than one Linux website on the same day. Switch your browser, btw, if you are encountering that limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-2/#comment-59334</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59334</guid>
		<description>&quot;Homer&quot; is not &quot;[H]omer&quot; or &quot;Slated&quot;.

&quot;Homer&quot; seems likely to be an OpenSUSE guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Homer&#8221; is not &#8220;[H]omer&#8221; or &#8220;Slated&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Homer&#8221; seems likely to be an OpenSUSE guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-2/#comment-59333</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59333</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Dear Jose, I think we should try to balance the good news message about Linux with out trenchant statements on the bad guys! That’s all

That&#039;s why I visit Linux Today as well as boycottnovell. The url should tip you off on the subject matter. Clearly the matter discussed on boycottnovell is very important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Dear Jose, I think we should try to balance the good news message about Linux with out trenchant statements on the bad guys! That’s all</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I visit Linux Today as well as boycottnovell. The url should tip you off on the subject matter. Clearly the matter discussed on boycottnovell is very important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Norrie</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-2/#comment-59331</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Norrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59331</guid>
		<description>Dear Jose, I think we should try to balance the good news message about Linux with out trenchant statements on the bad guys! That&#039;s all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jose, I think we should try to balance the good news message about Linux with out trenchant statements on the bad guys! That&#8217;s all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-1/#comment-59330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59330</guid>
		<description>[Charles Norrie] &gt;&gt; Instead of telling people how bad and even wicked Microsoft is, why not tell them how easy it is to install and use Linux systems, especially Ubuntu?

You must be joking.. right?

That&#039;s like saying we should say how good are the shoes made by AAA Shoes Boutique, while failing to say anything about what a rotten SOB is Al Capone and his band of thugs that have been extorting anyone seen within a block of AAA Shoes Boutique.

Dropping Microsoft, whether you go to Linux or to something else, is a plenty wonderful message to get out.

Of course, it doesn&#039;t help the Linux installation process that Microsoft keeps breaking the law throwing hurdles in front of Linux&#039; path through various levers deriving from their monopolies.

[&quot;Homer&quot;] &gt;&gt; Because Roy and his chums feel elevated by their belief that everyone else is either clueless or evil.

It&#039;s so easy to spew garbage from the mouth when such garbage need not be backed by any evidence, so please support your comments if you don&#039;t want to look foolish.. especially in light of all the evidence to the contrary.

I take it you aren&#039;t the same &quot;[H]omer&quot; that mans the irc channel on Freenode #boycottnovell. That guy seems a little more honest than you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Charles Norrie] &gt;&gt; Instead of telling people how bad and even wicked Microsoft is, why not tell them how easy it is to install and use Linux systems, especially Ubuntu?</p>
<p>You must be joking.. right?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s like saying we should say how good are the shoes made by AAA Shoes Boutique, while failing to say anything about what a rotten SOB is Al Capone and his band of thugs that have been extorting anyone seen within a block of AAA Shoes Boutique.</p>
<p>Dropping Microsoft, whether you go to Linux or to something else, is a plenty wonderful message to get out.</p>
<p>Of course, it doesn&#8217;t help the Linux installation process that Microsoft keeps breaking the law throwing hurdles in front of Linux&#8217; path through various levers deriving from their monopolies.</p>
<p>["Homer"] &gt;&gt; Because Roy and his chums feel elevated by their belief that everyone else is either clueless or evil.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s so easy to spew garbage from the mouth when such garbage need not be backed by any evidence, so please support your comments if you don&#8217;t want to look foolish.. especially in light of all the evidence to the contrary.</p>
<p>I take it you aren&#8217;t the same &#8220;[H]omer&#8221; that mans the irc channel on Freenode #boycottnovell. That guy seems a little more honest than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-1/#comment-59328</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59328</guid>
		<description>Because Roy and his chums feel elevated by their belief that everyone else is either clueless or evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Roy and his chums feel elevated by their belief that everyone else is either clueless or evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Norrie</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-1/#comment-59325</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Norrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59325</guid>
		<description>Instead of telling people how bad and even wicked Microsoft is, why not tell them how easy it is to install and use Linux systems, especially Ubuntu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of telling people how bad and even wicked Microsoft is, why not tell them how easy it is to install and use Linux systems, especially Ubuntu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/comment-page-1/#comment-59315</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/03/malware-techniques-dot-net/#comment-59315</guid>
		<description>If they already control so many PCs (and Secunia says 99% of Windows PCs are open to hijacking at all times), why even capture PCs at line/protocol level? It&#039;s like breaking down a door when there&#039;s an open window(s).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they already control so many PCs (and Secunia says 99% of Windows PCs are open to hijacking at all times), why even capture PCs at line/protocol level? It&#8217;s like breaking down a door when there&#8217;s an open window(s).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

