<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links 08/02/2009: Linux Aficionado in Government, New Distributions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcolon</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/comment-page-1/#comment-59457</link>
		<dc:creator>pcolon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/#comment-59457</guid>
		<description>The Need for Greed Syndrome.

First they push out the vaporware thru betas.

Now they&#039;re testing marketing and licensing schemes to see what sticks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Need for Greed Syndrome.</p>
<p>First they push out the vaporware thru betas.</p>
<p>Now they&#8217;re testing marketing and licensing schemes to see what sticks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/comment-page-1/#comment-59456</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/#comment-59456</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve stumbled upon at least 2 sources which said 2010 is likely as release year.

Granted, they could release a half-baked thing (like Vista) and continue development while it&#039;s live on people&#039;s desktops. Patches used to render Vista ubootable every other month or so.

Buy Vista 7 and become part of the testing process...

&quot;Guinea wha??&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve stumbled upon at least 2 sources which said 2010 is likely as release year.</p>
<p>Granted, they could release a half-baked thing (like Vista) and continue development while it&#8217;s live on people&#8217;s desktops. Patches used to render Vista ubootable every other month or so.</p>
<p>Buy Vista 7 and become part of the testing process&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Guinea wha??&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/comment-page-1/#comment-59455</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/#comment-59455</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe Steve &quot;Trains Run On Time&quot; Ballmer won&#039;t get Windows 7 out well in time for Christmas this year. I don&#039;t see how such a thing could even be implied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe Steve &#8220;Trains Run On Time&#8221; Ballmer won&#8217;t get Windows 7 out well in time for Christmas this year. I don&#8217;t see how such a thing could even be implied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/comment-page-1/#comment-59454</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 14:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/#comment-59454</guid>
		<description>The fact that XP for sub-notebooks runs until 2010 serves as a clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that XP for sub-notebooks runs until 2010 serves as a clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/comment-page-1/#comment-59453</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 13:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/08/linux-aficionado-in-us-govt/#comment-59453</guid>
		<description>The three-application limit for Windows 7 on netbooks is jawdroppingly stupid. It would take a while to start up, and use a lot of power, but Windows 7 would actually be quite usable in 512MB or 1GB memory.

So people are going to get a broken Windows 7, decide Windows sucks and go back to XP. Or maybe Linux.

I realise this is the closest Microsoft has to a market differentiator, to avoid selling the real Windows 7 at $0-$5 an OEM copy ... but what OEM is going to go for this, and what will the users say when they get it? This is how to turn Windows 7 into Vista in public perceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The three-application limit for Windows 7 on netbooks is jawdroppingly stupid. It would take a while to start up, and use a lot of power, but Windows 7 would actually be quite usable in 512MB or 1GB memory.</p>
<p>So people are going to get a broken Windows 7, decide Windows sucks and go back to XP. Or maybe Linux.</p>
<p>I realise this is the closest Microsoft has to a market differentiator, to avoid selling the real Windows 7 at $0-$5 an OEM copy &#8230; but what OEM is going to go for this, and what will the users say when they get it? This is how to turn Windows 7 into Vista in public perceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

