<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shareholder Likens Steve Ballmer and Bill Gates to Bernard Madoff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-59630</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 01:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/#comment-59630</guid>
		<description>We discussed this group in IRC today. It does seem a tad dodgy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We discussed this group in IRC today. It does seem a tad dodgy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-59629</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/#comment-59629</guid>
		<description>Oh, good Lord. I don&#039;t find it possible to take seriously a group who (a) misspell their own URL (b) keep the misspelt version!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, good Lord. I don&#8217;t find it possible to take seriously a group who (a) misspell their own URL (b) keep the misspelt version!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-59628</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/#comment-59628</guid>
		<description>Is there another source other than The Economist which indicates that Microsoft  lost $18 billion in 1998?

Any corroboration would be handy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there another source other than The Economist which indicates that Microsoft  lost $18 billion in 1998?</p>
<p>Any corroboration would be handy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Needs Sunlight</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-59627</link>
		<dc:creator>Needs Sunlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/02/12/shareholder-accusation-msft/#comment-59627</guid>
		<description>It would not surprise me if some or even most of the yammering about Unc Fester there were only a PR campaign to distance Gates from the pyramid scheme and subsequent collapse.  From day 1, it looked like Ballmer&#039;s job was to ride the scam into the ground.  After all, Gates did bail when he saw the figures for 1998...

However, SCO and then Novell, have been essential in postponing the popping of the bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would not surprise me if some or even most of the yammering about Unc Fester there were only a PR campaign to distance Gates from the pyramid scheme and subsequent collapse.  From day 1, it looked like Ballmer&#8217;s job was to ride the scam into the ground.  After all, Gates did bail when he saw the figures for 1998&#8230;</p>
<p>However, SCO and then Novell, have been essential in postponing the popping of the bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

