<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patents Roundup: Microsoft, Linux, Acacia, Junk Patents, and Pseudo Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/03/15/microsoft-linux-acacia-junk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/15/microsoft-linux-acacia-junk/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnD</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/15/microsoft-linux-acacia-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-60565</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/15/microsoft-linux-acacia-junk/#comment-60565</guid>
		<description>I think the IP issue is with respect to Unix and not Linux.  According to SCO Linux uses IP that is in UNIX system V which it licensed/purchased from Novell.  Since SCO was never able to produce clear cut evidence of UNIX IP being used in Linux - it&#039;s highly doubtful that SCO and/or Novell owns any piece of IP in Linux.
My hope was that Novell would just purchase SCO, end the lawsuits, and take a long hard look at why they could donate to the community or at least OIN.  I&#039;m pretty sure I read an article that showed M$ has licensed some IP from UNIX to allow Winblows servers to communicate with UNIX boxes.  Wouldn&#039;t that be something if the community actually &quot;owned&quot; a little piece of Windows...
Just because IP is old doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s useless - look at TCP/IP.  Another secret wish of mine was for Novell to dust off IPX and rebuild it as a replacement for TCP/IP - oh how I wish we could get away from DHCP servers and if we could add in autobinding to DNS - wouldn&#039;t the Net Admin&#039;s life be grand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the IP issue is with respect to Unix and not Linux.  According to SCO Linux uses IP that is in UNIX system V which it licensed/purchased from Novell.  Since SCO was never able to produce clear cut evidence of UNIX IP being used in Linux &#8211; it&#8217;s highly doubtful that SCO and/or Novell owns any piece of IP in Linux.<br />
My hope was that Novell would just purchase SCO, end the lawsuits, and take a long hard look at why they could donate to the community or at least OIN.  I&#8217;m pretty sure I read an article that showed M$ has licensed some IP from UNIX to allow Winblows servers to communicate with UNIX boxes.  Wouldn&#8217;t that be something if the community actually &#8220;owned&#8221; a little piece of Windows&#8230;<br />
Just because IP is old doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s useless &#8211; look at TCP/IP.  Another secret wish of mine was for Novell to dust off IPX and rebuild it as a replacement for TCP/IP &#8211; oh how I wish we could get away from DHCP servers and if we could add in autobinding to DNS &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t the Net Admin&#8217;s life be grand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeshna23</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/15/microsoft-linux-acacia-junk/comment-page-1/#comment-60564</link>
		<dc:creator>aeshna23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/15/microsoft-linux-acacia-junk/#comment-60564</guid>
		<description>I doubt that Microsoft would bother to buy Novell for the &quot;IP&quot;.  Whatever &quot;IP&quot; Novell &quot;owns&quot; in Linux must be close to being 20 years old and thus irrelevant.  Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that Microsoft would bother to buy Novell for the &#8220;IP&#8221;.  Whatever &#8220;IP&#8221; Novell &#8220;owns&#8221; in Linux must be close to being 20 years old and thus irrelevant.  Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

