<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazon&#8217;s Linux-powered and DRM-laden Gadget Sued for Patent Infringement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/ebook-linux-drm-and-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/ebook-linux-drm-and-patents/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/ebook-linux-drm-and-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-60776</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7192#comment-60776</guid>
		<description>Robert, I&#039;d like to find out more along the lines of what you just mentioned. Discovery Communications may have been wooed because they might feel they have a valuable position at risk, as a major source of educational material.

In fact, I had not realized or remembered that all of those channels were owned together [ http://corporate.discovery.com/our-company/ ]. The scent of monopolization is never too far from where you find Monopolysoft standing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, I&#8217;d like to find out more along the lines of what you just mentioned. Discovery Communications may have been wooed because they might feel they have a valuable position at risk, as a major source of educational material.</p>
<p>In fact, I had not realized or remembered that all of those channels were owned together [ <a href="http://corporate.discovery.com/our-company/" rel="nofollow">http://corporate.discovery.com/our-company/</a> ]. The scent of monopolization is never too far from where you find Monopolysoft standing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/ebook-linux-drm-and-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-60771</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7192#comment-60771</guid>
		<description>I was doing just that in 2002 with my Palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was doing just that in 2002 with my Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/ebook-linux-drm-and-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-60759</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7192#comment-60759</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the book reader that just plays PDFs? That&#039;s all I want, something good to read PDFs on! Apparently this is too simple. Or I can theoretically email PDFs to Amazon whereupon they will deign to translate them to DRMed format for me. How nice of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the book reader that just plays PDFs? That&#8217;s all I want, something good to read PDFs on! Apparently this is too simple. Or I can theoretically email PDFs to Amazon whereupon they will deign to translate them to DRMed format for me. How nice of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/21/ebook-linux-drm-and-patents/comment-page-1/#comment-60735</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7192#comment-60735</guid>
		<description>i believe that Microsoft might be involved with this lawsuit brought on by Discovery networks. i have noticed a lot of television advertising of Microsoft products on all of the networks that discovery owns (the History channel, Animal Plannet, etc). i have also seen the celebrities for a very popular show that is produced &amp; shown exclusevily on discovery networks main channel, &quot;The discovery channel&quot; do blurbs for Windows Vista on their show. the program is called Mythbusters. i used to like their show, but after seeing this, they have lost all credibillity.
i believe that Microsoft is using the Discovery networks as a proxy, just like they did with SCO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe that Microsoft might be involved with this lawsuit brought on by Discovery networks. i have noticed a lot of television advertising of Microsoft products on all of the networks that discovery owns (the History channel, Animal Plannet, etc). i have also seen the celebrities for a very popular show that is produced &amp; shown exclusevily on discovery networks main channel, &#8220;The discovery channel&#8221; do blurbs for Windows Vista on their show. the program is called Mythbusters. i used to like their show, but after seeing this, they have lost all credibillity.<br />
i believe that Microsoft is using the Discovery networks as a proxy, just like they did with SCO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

