<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the European Commission Harbour a Destruction of Free/Open Source Software Workgroup?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Urukipe</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/comment-page-1/#comment-60994</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Urukipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7357#comment-60994</guid>
		<description>Maybe the first step should indeed have been to find out more about the context (European Software Strategy (NOT OSS Strategy as wikileaks still has it: http://wikileaks.org/wiki/European_Commission_OSS_Strategy_Draft%2C_Mar_2009), organisation of industry participation, type and status of working groups, type of target document from the Commission&#039;s perspective etc.) rather than starting a doubtlessly lengthy process to get another copy of a document you already have. Everything seems to have started with this speach titled &quot;Towards a European Software Strategy&quot; by EU Commissioner Reding: http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/reding/docs/speeches/brussels_20071119.pdf. If you google for the speech title you&#039;ll find many papers by companies and associations that appear to have been drawn up in response. (NESSI has a document that appears to have been drawn up by the Commission as a summary of the input received, here: http://www.nessi-europe.com/Nessi/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=7teEO5hzywY%3D&amp;tabid=304&amp;mid=1571)

Note that the FSFE has already made some relevant points about the wikileak document and its interpretation (particularly the need to be careful to avoid drawing premature conclusions): http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=251

(As to the practicalities of finding the right people in the EU to talk to, note that the FSFE page mentions &quot;DG INFSO&quot; which I think is Commissioner Reding&#039;s department so her spokesman should have the details.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the first step should indeed have been to find out more about the context (European Software Strategy (NOT OSS Strategy as wikileaks still has it: <a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/European_Commission_OSS_Strategy_Draft%2C_Mar_2009" rel="nofollow">http://wikileaks.org/wiki/European_Commission_OSS_Strategy_Draft%2C_Mar_2009</a>), organisation of industry participation, type and status of working groups, type of target document from the Commission&#8217;s perspective etc.) rather than starting a doubtlessly lengthy process to get another copy of a document you already have. Everything seems to have started with this speach titled &#8220;Towards a European Software Strategy&#8221; by EU Commissioner Reding: <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/reding/docs/speeches/brussels_20071119.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ec.europa.eu/commission_barroso/reding/docs/speeches/brussels_20071119.pdf</a>. If you google for the speech title you&#8217;ll find many papers by companies and associations that appear to have been drawn up in response. (NESSI has a document that appears to have been drawn up by the Commission as a summary of the input received, here: <a href="http://www.nessi-europe.com/Nessi/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=7teEO5hzywY%3D&#038;tabid=304&#038;mid=1571" rel="nofollow">http://www.nessi-europe.com/Nessi/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=7teEO5hzywY%3D&#038;tabid=304&#038;mid=1571</a>)</p>
<p>Note that the FSFE has already made some relevant points about the wikileak document and its interpretation (particularly the need to be careful to avoid drawing premature conclusions): <a href="http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=251" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.fsfe.org/greve/?p=251</a></p>
<p>(As to the practicalities of finding the right people in the EU to talk to, note that the FSFE page mentions &#8220;DG INFSO&#8221; which I think is Commissioner Reding&#8217;s department so her spokesman should have the details.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari T.</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/comment-page-1/#comment-60987</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7357#comment-60987</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yes, that is exactly how politics works. Don’t be so naive!&quot;

I can&#039;t see anything naive in requiring openness from administration which is obliged by law to be open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes, that is exactly how politics works. Don’t be so naive!&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see anything naive in requiring openness from administration which is obliged by law to be open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/comment-page-1/#comment-60886</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7357#comment-60886</guid>
		<description>NotZed,

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Yes, that is exactly how politics works. Don’t be so naive!
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It was a rhetorical question. The text does not reflect on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NotZed,</p>
<blockquote><p>
Yes, that is exactly how politics works. Don’t be so naive!
</p></blockquote>
<p>It was a rhetorical question. The text does not reflect on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotZed</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/comment-page-1/#comment-60884</link>
		<dc:creator>NotZed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7357#comment-60884</guid>
		<description>Yes, that is exactly how politics works.  Don&#039;t be so naive!

And one things the Europeans are good at is making the politics complicated.

The only way to get results is if you have money - soft bribery or wasting it on lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is exactly how politics works.  Don&#8217;t be so naive!</p>
<p>And one things the Europeans are good at is making the politics complicated.</p>
<p>The only way to get results is if you have money &#8211; soft bribery or wasting it on lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality Jones</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/03/24/refusal-disclosure-ess/comment-page-1/#comment-60868</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=7357#comment-60868</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re looking for a scandal, but in reality it is more probable that the official who needs to reply to your request has yet to be identified by her or his 90,000 colleagues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re looking for a scandal, but in reality it is more probable that the official who needs to reply to your request has yet to be identified by her or his 90,000 colleagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

