<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Novell Seems Ready for Microsoft Takeover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/comment-page-1/#comment-62501</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=9423#comment-62501</guid>
		<description>Think of it not as &quot;sabotaging&quot; (from their POV). For over 10 years de Icaza has been a fan of COM and ActiveX; he just wants to bring that sort of stuff to an area where he develops.

&lt;font size=&quot;4&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;“At Microsoft I learned the truth about ActiveX and COM and I got very interested in it inmediately [sic].”&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;right&quot;&gt;
                                --&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Miguel de Icaza&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of it not as &#8220;sabotaging&#8221; (from their POV). For over 10 years de Icaza has been a fan of COM and ActiveX; he just wants to bring that sort of stuff to an area where he develops.</p>
<p><font size="4"><em>“At Microsoft I learned the truth about ActiveX and COM and I got very interested in it inmediately [sic].”</em></font></p>
<p align="right">
                                &#8211;<font size="3">Miguel de Icaza</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IGnatius T Foobar</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/comment-page-1/#comment-62500</link>
		<dc:creator>IGnatius T Foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=9423#comment-62500</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long suspected that Nat Friedman and Miguel de Icaza are *already* on the Microsoft payroll in some hidden sort of way.  They are quite obviously Microsoft moles who are being paid to sabotage Linux from the inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long suspected that Nat Friedman and Miguel de Icaza are *already* on the Microsoft payroll in some hidden sort of way.  They are quite obviously Microsoft moles who are being paid to sabotage Linux from the inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotZed</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/comment-page-1/#comment-62377</link>
		<dc:creator>NotZed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=9423#comment-62377</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why they would buy Novell.  They are worth more to M$ as a proxy (even an unwitting one, giving them the undeserved benefit of the doubt).

Then there&#039;s the GPL3 - any GPL3 code conveys patent rights from the distributor.  They&#039;d stay well clear of that.

There would be anti-trust issues as well, and if the USA didn&#039;t care, EU would (particularly given SUSE&#039;s roots).  Not that anti-trust seems to mean anything these days, even when it is applied it&#039;s far too little far too late, it&#039;s about time they got excluded from govt contracts or broken up, fines are just an operating expense.

There&#039;d be a hell of a backlash from a few of the remaining SUSE supporters, and no doubt un-ease from hardware vendors getting sucked back into the M$ protection racket just as they&#039;re finding a way to escape it.

Then again, with their falling revenues they&#039;re going to get increasingly desperate, and given their historically despicable behaviour, I guess it would be illogical to rule anything out completely.  It&#039;s going to get ugly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why they would buy Novell.  They are worth more to M$ as a proxy (even an unwitting one, giving them the undeserved benefit of the doubt).</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the GPL3 &#8211; any GPL3 code conveys patent rights from the distributor.  They&#8217;d stay well clear of that.</p>
<p>There would be anti-trust issues as well, and if the USA didn&#8217;t care, EU would (particularly given SUSE&#8217;s roots).  Not that anti-trust seems to mean anything these days, even when it is applied it&#8217;s far too little far too late, it&#8217;s about time they got excluded from govt contracts or broken up, fines are just an operating expense.</p>
<p>There&#8217;d be a hell of a backlash from a few of the remaining SUSE supporters, and no doubt un-ease from hardware vendors getting sucked back into the M$ protection racket just as they&#8217;re finding a way to escape it.</p>
<p>Then again, with their falling revenues they&#8217;re going to get increasingly desperate, and given their historically despicable behaviour, I guess it would be illogical to rule anything out completely.  It&#8217;s going to get ugly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/comment-page-1/#comment-62372</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=9423#comment-62372</guid>
		<description>See his post after the Novell/Microsoft deal was announced. He was A Major Backer&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt;.

There&#039;s also this:
http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Sep-05.html

And this: 

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jan-30.html
The EU Prosecutors are Wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See his post after the Novell/Microsoft deal was announced. He was A Major Backer<sup>TM</sup>.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also this:<br />
<a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Sep-05.html" rel="nofollow">http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Sep-05.html</a></p>
<p>And this: </p>
<p><a href="http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jan-30.html" rel="nofollow">http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Jan-30.html</a><br />
The EU Prosecutors are Wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeshna23</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/04/25/novell-microsoft-takeover/comment-page-1/#comment-62371</link>
		<dc:creator>aeshna23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=9423#comment-62371</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There would be plenty of support from Novell for a takeover - people like vice-presidents Nat Friedman and Miguel de Icaza would be major backers of any takeover bid. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

That Miguel de Icaza would be &quot;a major backer&quot; of a MS takeover bid is another bit of evidence that mono is the danger that we claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There would be plenty of support from Novell for a takeover &#8211; people like vice-presidents Nat Friedman and Miguel de Icaza would be major backers of any takeover bid. </p></blockquote>
<p>That Miguel de Icaza would be &#8220;a major backer&#8221; of a MS takeover bid is another bit of evidence that mono is the danger that we claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

