<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three New Articles Question Net Applications&#8217; Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/05/06/net-applications-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/06/net-applications-debunked/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JR Namida</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/06/net-applications-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-63128</link>
		<dc:creator>JR Namida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=10322#comment-63128</guid>
		<description>one year ago there were never questions asked about Linux on Yahoo answers, now there are question, this has happened in the last 12 months...

JR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one year ago there were never questions asked about Linux on Yahoo answers, now there are question, this has happened in the last 12 months&#8230;</p>
<p>JR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gentoo User</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/06/net-applications-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-63072</link>
		<dc:creator>Gentoo User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 19:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=10322#comment-63072</guid>
		<description>How is it possible that all the other companies report roughly the same numbers? The Wikipedia article on desktop OS market share lists three more companies besides Hitslink, and I don&#039;t think any of them put Linux anywhere above 2% or so.

Are all these companies in Microsoft&#039;s evil pockets as well? And how come they are allowed to report such &quot;artificially&quot; (right?) high numbers for OS X?

What do &lt;b&gt;you&lt;/b&gt; think is the correct number, and what are you planning on backing it up with? Do you just want people to trust your intuition and/or your gut feeling after you&#039;ve successfully sold them the &quot;company X is corrupt because they&#039;re not reporting the numbers I want&quot; PR line?

And another thing. Why do you insist on passing your opinions as fact? Your supporting links as usual don&#039;t support anything - in one you even mention that one of NetApplications&#039; partners is Opera... is Opera also paying them to report an artificial market share for their browser? I hope they ask for their money back because as far as I can see they&#039;re still far behind Mozilla. Which brings me to the other point: How is it possible that NetApplications is reporting such high numbers for Firefox, if they&#039;re in Microsoft&#039;s pockets? Can you expand on that as well, please?

Finally, why do you insist on purposefully confusing &lt;b&gt;desktop OS share&lt;/b&gt;, which is what this is about, with devices, the embedded market and so on?

I just noticed that DistroWatch says Gentoo is far less popular than even Arch and Zenwalk... since I don&#039;t like that number, can I make up my own? Can I just claim DW is in Shuttleworth&#039;s pocket? What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it possible that all the other companies report roughly the same numbers? The Wikipedia article on desktop OS market share lists three more companies besides Hitslink, and I don&#8217;t think any of them put Linux anywhere above 2% or so.</p>
<p>Are all these companies in Microsoft&#8217;s evil pockets as well? And how come they are allowed to report such &#8220;artificially&#8221; (right?) high numbers for OS X?</p>
<p>What do <b>you</b> think is the correct number, and what are you planning on backing it up with? Do you just want people to trust your intuition and/or your gut feeling after you&#8217;ve successfully sold them the &#8220;company X is corrupt because they&#8217;re not reporting the numbers I want&#8221; PR line?</p>
<p>And another thing. Why do you insist on passing your opinions as fact? Your supporting links as usual don&#8217;t support anything &#8211; in one you even mention that one of NetApplications&#8217; partners is Opera&#8230; is Opera also paying them to report an artificial market share for their browser? I hope they ask for their money back because as far as I can see they&#8217;re still far behind Mozilla. Which brings me to the other point: How is it possible that NetApplications is reporting such high numbers for Firefox, if they&#8217;re in Microsoft&#8217;s pockets? Can you expand on that as well, please?</p>
<p>Finally, why do you insist on purposefully confusing <b>desktop OS share</b>, which is what this is about, with devices, the embedded market and so on?</p>
<p>I just noticed that DistroWatch says Gentoo is far less popular than even Arch and Zenwalk&#8230; since I don&#8217;t like that number, can I make up my own? Can I just claim DW is in Shuttleworth&#8217;s pocket? What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

