<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links 12/05/2009: Fedora 12 Features Preview, TrueCrypt 6.2 is Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/05/12/truecrypt-62-is-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/12/truecrypt-62-is-out/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeshna23</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/12/truecrypt-62-is-out/comment-page-1/#comment-63498</link>
		<dc:creator>aeshna23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 01:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=10773#comment-63498</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
What’s the point of a Windows 7 ARM port?

    If Microsoft really wanted to shake things up and take on Linux, the company would develop one single kernel and platform to run across desktops, servers, phones, and the Xbox. But even then, Linux would still retain one important advantage beyond its one-kernel-fits-all approach: Linux can never come under antitrust scrutiny for being too successful. 

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

This is just the most stupid statement I can imagine.  Windows is not under antitrust scrutiny for being &quot;too successful&quot;.  It&#039;s under antitrust scrutiny for unethical and illegal practices to avoid the competition which would make the word &quot;success&quot; meaningful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
What’s the point of a Windows 7 ARM port?</p>
<p>    If Microsoft really wanted to shake things up and take on Linux, the company would develop one single kernel and platform to run across desktops, servers, phones, and the Xbox. But even then, Linux would still retain one important advantage beyond its one-kernel-fits-all approach: Linux can never come under antitrust scrutiny for being too successful. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is just the most stupid statement I can imagine.  Windows is not under antitrust scrutiny for being &#8220;too successful&#8221;.  It&#8217;s under antitrust scrutiny for unethical and illegal practices to avoid the competition which would make the word &#8220;success&#8221; meaningful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

