<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Allegedly Colludes with Microsoft (Again) to Elevate Profit, Promote Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/05/27/intel-microsoft-cartel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/27/intel-microsoft-cartel/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/27/intel-microsoft-cartel/comment-page-1/#comment-64108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=11552#comment-64108</guid>
		<description>Can we say backfire?

It almost seems Intel is working for Linux. Every market where Microsoft decides to keep out their low cost pricing opens opportunities for Linux. Of course, the idea is that only at the low end would Linux be a threat; however, I expect Microsoft to continue with their back-peddling when they realize their mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we say backfire?</p>
<p>It almost seems Intel is working for Linux. Every market where Microsoft decides to keep out their low cost pricing opens opportunities for Linux. Of course, the idea is that only at the low end would Linux be a threat; however, I expect Microsoft to continue with their back-peddling when they realize their mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

