<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reader&#8217;s Article: Does Microsoft Create Security FUD Against Rivals?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/05/29/security-fud-against-rivals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/29/security-fud-against-rivals/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabayon User (YGUG)</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/29/security-fud-against-rivals/comment-page-1/#comment-64274</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabayon User (YGUG)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=11727#comment-64274</guid>
		<description>You really have no idea what you&#039;re talking about, do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really have no idea what you&#8217;re talking about, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/29/security-fud-against-rivals/comment-page-1/#comment-64254</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=11727#comment-64254</guid>
		<description>Some say it&#039;s just a fancy name for &quot;buffer overflows&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some say it&#8217;s just a fancy name for &#8220;buffer overflows&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeshna23</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/29/security-fud-against-rivals/comment-page-1/#comment-64253</link>
		<dc:creator>aeshna23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=11727#comment-64253</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m way out of my area of knowledge here, but I did have one guess about what&#039;s going on here.  It&#039;s my understanding that the applications and the operating system are as not as isolated from each in Windows as in Unix based operating systems.  Since pool overruns exploit OS bugs, could it be that Windows needs safe unlinking much more than any other OS?  Are they just fixing a problem created by the original poor design of Windows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m way out of my area of knowledge here, but I did have one guess about what&#8217;s going on here.  It&#8217;s my understanding that the applications and the operating system are as not as isolated from each in Windows as in Unix based operating systems.  Since pool overruns exploit OS bugs, could it be that Windows needs safe unlinking much more than any other OS?  Are they just fixing a problem created by the original poor design of Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saulgoode</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/05/29/security-fud-against-rivals/comment-page-1/#comment-64249</link>
		<dc:creator>saulgoode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=11727#comment-64249</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Are there any actual examples of ‘pool overruns’, in the public domain, that can be successfully run on Mac OS X and GNU/Linux?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The article doesn&#039;t actually state that the &quot;pool overruns&quot; exploit has ever been a problem for OS X or GNU/Linux, only that the independent security evaluator who reported on the Microsoft problem has (at some point in his career) &quot;exploited weaknesses&quot; on those systems. From the wording of the article it should not be presumed that said weaknesses had anything to do with &quot;pool overruns&quot; (or even that they were serious).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are there any actual examples of ‘pool overruns’, in the public domain, that can be successfully run on Mac OS X and GNU/Linux?</p></blockquote>
<p>The article doesn&#8217;t actually state that the &#8220;pool overruns&#8221; exploit has ever been a problem for OS X or GNU/Linux, only that the independent security evaluator who reported on the Microsoft problem has (at some point in his career) &#8220;exploited weaknesses&#8221; on those systems. From the wording of the article it should not be presumed that said weaknesses had anything to do with &#8220;pool overruns&#8221; (or even that they were serious).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

