<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft&#8217;s Nathan Myhrvold on How “to Freeze the Market at the OEM and ISV Level”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/06/21/nathan-myhrvold-antitrust-memo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/21/nathan-myhrvold-antitrust-memo/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/21/nathan-myhrvold-antitrust-memo/comment-page-1/#comment-67361</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=13584#comment-67361</guid>
		<description>Yes, the issue is then to do with consistency. Some suggested &quot;freedomware&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the issue is then to do with consistency. Some suggested &#8220;freedomware&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Oliver</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/21/nathan-myhrvold-antitrust-memo/comment-page-1/#comment-67360</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=13584#comment-67360</guid>
		<description>That was interesting but hard to read. Who is this Myhrvold again? I assume he was working for Microsoft but doesn&#039;t now.

The thing on open in regard to hardware seems a fair usage. That was the point of the PC, open hardware specced by IBM originally. If Microsoft were using the term open for everything before open source appeared, maybe it&#039;s a bit harsh to complain later that they continue to use the term. 

The term free software suffers too but in a different way: the assumption is that the &quot;free&quot; is as in beer.

Maybe a new term is needed that is harder to pollute. Just adding a &quot;dom&quot; to free might help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was interesting but hard to read. Who is this Myhrvold again? I assume he was working for Microsoft but doesn&#8217;t now.</p>
<p>The thing on open in regard to hardware seems a fair usage. That was the point of the PC, open hardware specced by IBM originally. If Microsoft were using the term open for everything before open source appeared, maybe it&#8217;s a bit harsh to complain later that they continue to use the term. </p>
<p>The term free software suffers too but in a different way: the assumption is that the &#8220;free&#8221; is as in beer.</p>
<p>Maybe a new term is needed that is harder to pollute. Just adding a &#8220;dom&#8221; to free might help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

