<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Further Signs That Novell Will Sell in Parts, Stock Rebounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/06/24/novl-stock-falls-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/24/novl-stock-falls-again/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David "Lefty" Schlesinger</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/24/novl-stock-falls-again/comment-page-1/#comment-67736</link>
		<dc:creator>David "Lefty" Schlesinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 00:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=13806#comment-67736</guid>
		<description>Okay, Roy, this is getting inane.

Just to inject a much-needed note of reality here, if the management of Novell has filed an 8-K with the SEC saying that they don&#039;t intend to sell the company, they &lt;I&gt;don&#039;t &lt;/i&gt;mean that they intend to sell &lt;I&gt;part &lt;/i&gt;of the company, unless they want to find themselves doing a &quot;perp walk&quot;.

Misleading investors is a &lt;I&gt;felony &lt;/i&gt;no-no under US Securities law, and I&#039;m pretty confident that the SEC would view an explanation that &quot;we didn&#039;t say we wouldn&#039;t &lt;I&gt;split up &lt;/i&gt;and sell a chunk of the company, exactly&quot; as having much merit. &quot;Thinking about&quot; selling all or part the company is a &lt;I&gt;plan, &lt;/i&gt;Roy, and I wouldn&#039;t assume that the authorities here have nearly the liking for word games that you seem to imagine they do. (It may have escaped your notice that, to give just one example, the SEC is considering whether Apple misled investors by being cagey about Steve Jobs&#039; health, and that&#039;s a lot iffier than what you&#039;re suggesting Novell is doing.)

These things are not hard to determine if you do a minimal amount--and I&#039;m talking about ten seconds worth--of research. It&#039;s not surprising, it&#039;s just more evidence that you couldn&#039;t care less about facts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Roy, this is getting inane.</p>
<p>Just to inject a much-needed note of reality here, if the management of Novell has filed an 8-K with the SEC saying that they don&#8217;t intend to sell the company, they <i>don&#8217;t </i>mean that they intend to sell <i>part </i>of the company, unless they want to find themselves doing a &#8220;perp walk&#8221;.</p>
<p>Misleading investors is a <i>felony </i>no-no under US Securities law, and I&#8217;m pretty confident that the SEC would view an explanation that &#8220;we didn&#8217;t say we wouldn&#8217;t <i>split up </i>and sell a chunk of the company, exactly&#8221; as having much merit. &#8220;Thinking about&#8221; selling all or part the company is a <i>plan, </i>Roy, and I wouldn&#8217;t assume that the authorities here have nearly the liking for word games that you seem to imagine they do. (It may have escaped your notice that, to give just one example, the SEC is considering whether Apple misled investors by being cagey about Steve Jobs&#8217; health, and that&#8217;s a lot iffier than what you&#8217;re suggesting Novell is doing.)</p>
<p>These things are not hard to determine if you do a minimal amount&#8211;and I&#8217;m talking about ten seconds worth&#8211;of research. It&#8217;s not surprising, it&#8217;s just more evidence that you couldn&#8217;t care less about facts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

