<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patents Roundup: OIN Addresses Patent Trolls Issue, Public Patent Foundation Video, and More</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/06/29/oin-and-public-patent-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/29/oin-and-public-patent-foundation/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/29/oin-and-public-patent-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-68856</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=14176#comment-68856</guid>
		<description>Peer2patent, OIN, and RAND pose similar problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peer2patent, OIN, and RAND pose similar problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose_X</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/06/29/oin-and-public-patent-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-68853</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose_X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=14176#comment-68853</guid>
		<description>Interesting video, but the speaker appeared to leave room for allowing many types of (strong) software patents and royalties for them. He did not state details, but I can see how such details might still leave the public and many many potential inventors being sold quite short. One example that comes to mind is that I don&#039;t remember him questioning the foolishness of giving a patent to one person as if an invention (a) happens all because of one person or even (b) can&#039;t frequently be recreated by others in a time span much shorter than 20 years. However, he did state the Cisco exec and Billg quotes. He also pointed to a great many of the most unfair issues with today&#039;s patents.

I do worry about compromises that will still leave in lots of hurt for much FOSS and much of the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting video, but the speaker appeared to leave room for allowing many types of (strong) software patents and royalties for them. He did not state details, but I can see how such details might still leave the public and many many potential inventors being sold quite short. One example that comes to mind is that I don&#8217;t remember him questioning the foolishness of giving a patent to one person as if an invention (a) happens all because of one person or even (b) can&#8217;t frequently be recreated by others in a time span much shorter than 20 years. However, he did state the Cisco exec and Billg quotes. He also pointed to a great many of the most unfair issues with today&#8217;s patents.</p>
<p>I do worry about compromises that will still leave in lots of hurt for much FOSS and much of the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

