<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groklaw Unearths Another SCO Scandal; SCO Heads Sued for Theft, Computer Fraud and Abuse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/07/11/another-sco-scandal-unxis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/11/another-sco-scandal-unxis/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/11/another-sco-scandal-unxis/comment-page-1/#comment-69302</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=14551#comment-69302</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say with sarcasm that Microsoft will probably have him &quot;suicided&quot;* before IBM gets to The Puppet Master. There is one Microsoft employee who dived out his office window in WA some months ago, but it is not related.

__
* suicided is a term used to describe deaths like that of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(weapons_expert)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Doctor Kelly&lt;/a&gt;, where the secrets kept by the victim are too sensitive to make a suicide easily believable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say with sarcasm that Microsoft will probably have him &#8220;suicided&#8221;* before IBM gets to The Puppet Master. There is one Microsoft employee who dived out his office window in WA some months ago, but it is not related.</p>
<p>__<br />
* suicided is a term used to describe deaths like that of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kelly_(weapons_expert)" rel="nofollow">Doctor Kelly</a>, where the secrets kept by the victim are too sensitive to make a suicide easily believable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amd-linux</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/11/another-sco-scandal-unxis/comment-page-1/#comment-69301</link>
		<dc:creator>amd-linux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=14551#comment-69301</guid>
		<description>The SCO case has the potential to break Micro-Soft&#039;s neck. 

If IBM should be able to proove that SCO is a MS puppet and MS stiffles deliberately IBM&#039;s Linux business, the damages for which IBM might sue Micro-Soft will well exceed all cash reserves of Micro-Soft.

And somehow I feel that we are getting closer to the day when IBM finally decides to go after he puppet master.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SCO case has the potential to break Micro-Soft&#8217;s neck. </p>
<p>If IBM should be able to proove that SCO is a MS puppet and MS stiffles deliberately IBM&#8217;s Linux business, the damages for which IBM might sue Micro-Soft will well exceed all cash reserves of Micro-Soft.</p>
<p>And somehow I feel that we are getting closer to the day when IBM finally decides to go after he puppet master.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/11/another-sco-scandal-unxis/comment-page-1/#comment-69295</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=14551#comment-69295</guid>
		<description>Groklaw reckons Microsoft expands a little in Utah in order to employ/reward SCO employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groklaw reckons Microsoft expands a little in Utah in order to employ/reward SCO employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/11/another-sco-scandal-unxis/comment-page-1/#comment-69293</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=14551#comment-69293</guid>
		<description>Hey, a minor amusing note from Wikipedia:

When Google Chrome OS was announced, the shills commented saying &quot;uh this is just a copy of the Microsoft Gazelle browser OS ya rly.&quot; Gazelle is of course vaporware - it exists only as a Microsoft Research paper, no product in sight. So I went to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazelle_(web_browser)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia article&lt;/a&gt;, which was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;oldid=300355363&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one-paragraph note&lt;/a&gt; with no third-party references. So I &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;oldid=300976298&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tagged it&lt;/a&gt; for &quot;prospective deletion&quot;, which means &quot;this really needs either fixing or trashing soon thanks.&quot; Within three hours, an IP editor &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;diff=301011775&amp;oldid=300976298&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;came along&lt;/a&gt; and brought it up to just about minimum standard. So the article lives.

The IP is there in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;action=history&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;history&lt;/a&gt;, it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/192.102.82.253&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;192.102.82.253&lt;/a&gt;, which is &lt;a href=&quot;http://whois.domaintools.com/192.102.82.253&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;owned by&lt;/a&gt; ... The SCO Group, Lindon UT!

Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that, of course, SCO and Microsoft are completely separate entities, and good contributions from anywhere are most welcome. Yep.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, a minor amusing note from Wikipedia:</p>
<p>When Google Chrome OS was announced, the shills commented saying &#8220;uh this is just a copy of the Microsoft Gazelle browser OS ya rly.&#8221; Gazelle is of course vaporware &#8211; it exists only as a Microsoft Research paper, no product in sight. So I went to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gazelle_(web_browser)" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia article</a>, which was a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;oldid=300355363" rel="nofollow">one-paragraph note</a> with no third-party references. So I <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;oldid=300976298" rel="nofollow">tagged it</a> for &#8220;prospective deletion&#8221;, which means &#8220;this really needs either fixing or trashing soon thanks.&#8221; Within three hours, an IP editor <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;diff=301011775&amp;oldid=300976298" rel="nofollow">came along</a> and brought it up to just about minimum standard. So the article lives.</p>
<p>The IP is there in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gazelle_(web_browser)&amp;action=history" rel="nofollow">history</a>, it&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/192.102.82.253" rel="nofollow">192.102.82.253</a>, which is <a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/192.102.82.253" rel="nofollow">owned by</a> &#8230; The SCO Group, Lindon UT!</p>
<p>Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that, of course, SCO and Microsoft are completely separate entities, and good contributions from anywhere are most welcome. Yep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

