<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patents Roundup: Microsoft Stung, Microsoft&#8217;s Troll Speaks to Facebook, Alternatives Considered, and USPTO Head Calls Patents “Monopolies”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/07/20/microsoft-troll-facebook-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/20/microsoft-troll-facebook-and-more/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zatoichi</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/20/microsoft-troll-facebook-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-71013</link>
		<dc:creator>zatoichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 06:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=15236#comment-71013</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&lt;i&gt;Research In Motion (RIMM) this morning said it will pay $267.5 million as part of an agreement to settle all existing patent litigation with venture-backed Visto, which is now known as Good Technology.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

I take strong exception to your characterization of Good Technologies as a &quot;patent troll&quot;. Good has been making synchronization solutions for use with Exchange servers (don&#039;t start, people use them, there isn&#039;t a law against it) for more years than Research in Motion has been making Blackberries. Good made the first Exchange sync solution for Palm Os (and I worked for Palm from 2001-2003, so I&#039;m in a position to speak authoritatively here.)

Whether you like or dislike patents, they exist, and if Good has one that RIM is infringing--and as I said, it seems quite likely that they might--and if RIM has refused to come to terms with them, then they have every right to settle it in court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><i>Research In Motion (RIMM) this morning said it will pay $267.5 million as part of an agreement to settle all existing patent litigation with venture-backed Visto, which is now known as Good Technology.</i></b></p>
<p>I take strong exception to your characterization of Good Technologies as a &#8220;patent troll&#8221;. Good has been making synchronization solutions for use with Exchange servers (don&#8217;t start, people use them, there isn&#8217;t a law against it) for more years than Research in Motion has been making Blackberries. Good made the first Exchange sync solution for Palm Os (and I worked for Palm from 2001-2003, so I&#8217;m in a position to speak authoritatively here.)</p>
<p>Whether you like or dislike patents, they exist, and if Good has one that RIM is infringing&#8211;and as I said, it seems quite likely that they might&#8211;and if RIM has refused to come to terms with them, then they have every right to settle it in court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

