<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patents Roundup: Why Microsoft&#8217;s Patents Are Useless; More Patent Failure News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/07/24/microsoft-patents-useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/24/microsoft-patents-useless/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zatoichi</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/24/microsoft-patents-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-71404</link>
		<dc:creator>zatoichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=15431#comment-71404</guid>
		<description>&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;What does, worring about mono, have to do with patents being useless?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

I have to imagine that you just haven&#039;t been paying attention, Dario. &lt;I&gt;All &lt;/i&gt;of the objections to Mono stem from concerns that pottions of it may infringe patents held by Microsoft. If those patents are &quot;useless&quot;, then what other concerns remain regarding Mono?

&lt;B&gt;&lt;I&gt;Nothing. You’re talking nonsense &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

Well, &lt;I&gt;one &lt;/i&gt;of us is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b><i>What does, worring about mono, have to do with patents being useless?</i></b></p>
<p>I have to imagine that you just haven&#8217;t been paying attention, Dario. <i>All </i>of the objections to Mono stem from concerns that pottions of it may infringe patents held by Microsoft. If those patents are &#8220;useless&#8221;, then what other concerns remain regarding Mono?</p>
<p><b><i>Nothing. You’re talking nonsense </i></b></p>
<p>Well, <i>one </i>of us is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/24/microsoft-patents-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-71395</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=15431#comment-71395</guid>
		<description>zatochi = troll
@zatochi
What does, worring about mono, have to do with patents being useless?
Nothing. You&#039;re talking nonsense</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>zatochi = troll<br />
@zatochi<br />
What does, worring about mono, have to do with patents being useless?<br />
Nothing. You&#8217;re talking nonsense</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zatoichi</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/24/microsoft-patents-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-71275</link>
		<dc:creator>zatoichi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 02:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=15431#comment-71275</guid>
		<description>If Microsoft&#039;s patents are &quot;useless&quot;, why worry about Mono...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Microsoft&#8217;s patents are &#8220;useless&#8221;, why worry about Mono&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/07/24/microsoft-patents-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-71269</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=15431#comment-71269</guid>
		<description>&quot;Microsoft was never known for innovation, no matter how much it repeated the word “innovation”. &quot;
Even MS-DOS was actually bought from SCP, and that only because DR refused the IBM contract for a 8086 version of CP/M or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Microsoft was never known for innovation, no matter how much it repeated the word “innovation”. &#8221;<br />
Even MS-DOS was actually bought from SCP, and that only because DR refused the IBM contract for a 8086 version of CP/M or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

