EditorsAbout the SiteComes vs. MicrosoftUsing This Web SiteSite ArchivesCredibility IndexOOXMLOpenDocumentPatentsNovellNews DigestSite NewsRSS

07.27.09

Steve Ballmer, 2 Years Ago: Open Source “Not a Business Model We Can Embrace”

Posted in Deception, Finance, GNU/Linux, Microsoft, Quote, Steve Ballmer at 6:22 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Microsoft claims that it’s changing, but to what extent is it willing based on its own words?

Almost precisely two years ago (July 26th, 2007) Steve Ballmer said:

“Open source: open source has been the issue that surrounds us. Could a commercial model like Microsoft compete with open source? And we’ve worked very hard on making the value of a commercial company surpass what the open source community can deliver, because frankly, it’s not a business model we can embrace. It’s inconsistent with shareholder value.”

It is worth stressing that Moodle's plug-in from Microsoft was only intended to increase lock-in on ‘the cloud’ and what Microsoft gave to Linux was a tool for marketing Windows [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. These two ‘contributions’ had to be made Free software in order to enter circulation, so they don’t represent change.

Share this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • co.mments
  • DZone
  • email
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine
  • Print
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Facebook

If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

Pages that cross-reference this one

8 Comments

  1. zatoichi said,

    July 27, 2009 at 10:43 am

    Gravatar

    Steve Ballmer says a lot of silly things. So do people here, like Mr. Wakizashi and Mr. Hill.

    However, as the recent submission of the Hyper-V drivers under the GPLv2 demonstrates, Microsoft has no choice but to do thing our way. At least not if they want to keep selling those Windows Server 2008 licenses.

    Talk about “sore winners“!

    Jose_X Reply:

    >> Steve Ballmer says a lot of silly things. So do people here, like Mr. Wakizashi and Mr. Hill.

    Do you think Ballmer’s line about not being able to embrace the open source business model (probably means something like what Red Hat has done) was one of his silly lines?

    Whatever they do, their money today comes from monopoly profits. Their sustained control and interlocking monopolies are grounded in their closed source approach.

  2. Jose_X said,

    July 27, 2009 at 9:34 pm

    Gravatar

    Microsoft has frequently done things “others’ way”. They call it embracing.

    It’s good when they can’t have their preferred way, eg, having to adapt for now to ODF and Linux and GPL, but those are but a small number of battles.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tortoise_and_the_Hare , and we aren’t exactly the hare nor they the tortoise.

    >> Talk about “sore winners“!

    Are you suggesting their war against us is over?

    Jose_X Reply:

    >> Microsoft has frequently done things “others’ way”. They call it embracing.

    Microsoft person: But we already paid for some google ads. Why is Google building more webservices, browsers, and an OS?

    zatoichi Reply:

    Microsoft person: But we already paid for some google ads. Why is Google building more webservices, browsers, and an OS?

    I fail to see the relevance, or even the meaning, of this comment.

    Jose_X Reply:

    Well, they played on Google’s terms didn’t they?

    So now would Google be a “sore winner” because, despite Microsoft coming to them to take ads on Google’s property on Google’s terms, Google probably still doesn’t much trust Microsoft and is still competing fiercely?

    That sore winner, Google! They won that battle. What more do they want? Some sore winners can never get enough!

    Or we should all be so happy and appreciative because Microsoft is taking many ads out on Linux Today and other similar sites? Hey, they recognize us. Wow-wee!

    To be serious, I think we have a few hundred thousand “sore winners” to send Microsoft’s way.

    zatoichi Reply:

    They call it embracing.

    Feel free to explain how this applies to completely open sourced drivers, submitted in conformance with the terms of the GPLv2.

    For extra credit, explain why “liberty or death” doesn’t apply here. Roy’s already shown that he has either not read the GPLv2, or, having read it, didn’t understand it.

    Can you do better, Jose?

    Jose_X Reply:

    “And we’ve worked very hard on making the value of a commercial company surpass what the open source community can deliver, because frankly, it’s not a business model we can embrace. It’s inconsistent with shareholder value.”

    Note, they are not embracing Red Hat’s business model, at least not as their exclusive answer to FOSS. Their added value is through unique extensions. Their desired business model rests on closed source monopolies.

    Embrace is when you go play by the rules of the competition.

    Embrace: They embrace Linux with these GPLv2 drivers in order to provide what customers want but under terms Microsoft likes. [Linux running on top of Microsoft software.]

    Extend: By embracing, they absorb marketshare that might not have gone to them (vs Linux or VMWare); thus, in more deployment instances, they maintain control over all software on the stack and are in a position to execute their extend as necessary.

    Extinguish: Microsoft plays with a proven track record and still from a position of monopoly levers. Shareholder value is preserved by them maintaining monopolies. They embrace, to extend and extinguish, as monopoly control/profits implies limited competition.

What Else is New


  1. Links 22/5/2019: Mesa 19.0.5, Huawei and GNU/Linux, Curl 7.65.0, End of Antergos, Tails 3.14, ownCloud Server 10.2, Firefox 67.0

    Links for the day



  2. Quality of Patents is Going Down the Drain and Courts Have Certainly Noticed

    Uncertainty or lack of confidence in the patent system has reached appalling levels because heads of patent offices are just striving to grant as many patents as possible, irrespective of the underlying law



  3. EUIPO and EPO Abuses Growingly Inseparable

    'Musical chairs' at CEIPI and the EPO/EUIPO (Battistelli, Archambeau, Campinos) as well as joint reports never fail to reveal the extent to which EPO abuses are spreading



  4. Links 21/5/2019: China's GAFAM Exit, DragonFlyBSD 5.4.3

    Links for the day



  5. Links 20/5/2019: Linux 5.2 RC1, LibreOffice 6.3 Alpha, DXVK 1.2.1, Bison 3.4 Released

    Links for the day



  6. South Korea's Government Will Show If Microsoft Loves Linux or Just Attacks It Very Viciously Like It Did in Munich

    Microsoft's hatred of all things GNU/Linux is always put to the test when someone 'dares' use it outside Microsoft's control and cash cows (e.g. Azure and Vista 10/WSL); will Microsoft combat its longstanding urge to corrupt or oust officials with the courage to say "no" to Microsoft?



  7. Links 19/5/2019: KDE Applications 19.04.1 in FlatHub and GNU/Linux Adoption

    Links for the day



  8. The War on Patent Quality

    A look at the EPO's reluctance to admit errors and resistance to the EPC, which is its very founding document



  9. Watchtroll, Composed by Patent Trolls, Calls the American Patent System “Corrupt”

    Another very fine piece from Watchtroll comes from very fine patent trolls who cheer for Donald Trump as if he's the one who tackles corruption rather than spreading it



  10. Unified Patent Court Won't Happen Just Because the Litigation Microcosm Wants It

    Unified Patent Court (UPC) hopefuls are quote-mining and cherry-picking to manufacture the false impression that the UPC is just around the corner when in reality the UPC is pretty much dead (but not buried yet)



  11. Links 17/5/2019: South Korea's GNU/Linux Pivot, Linux 5.1.3

    Links for the day



  12. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 4: Happy Birthday to the Kötter Group?

    This year the Kötter Group commemorates the 85th anniversary of its existence. But is it really a cause for celebration or would a less self-congratulatory approach be more fitting? And does it create the risk that a routine tendering exercise at the EPO will turn into Operation Charlie Foxtrot?



  13. Links 16/5/2019: Cockpit 194, VMware Acquires Bitnami, Another Wine Announcement and Krita 4.2.0 Beta

    Links for the day



  14. The EPO's Key Function -- Like the UPC's Vision -- Has Virtually Collapsed

    The EPO no longer issues good patents and staff is extremely unhappy; but the Office tries to create an alternate (false) reality and issues intentionally misleading statements



  15. Stanford's NPE Litigation Database Makes a Nice Addition in the Fight Against Software Patent Trolls

    As the United States of America becomes less trolls- and software patents-friendly (often conflated with plaintiff (un)friendliness) it's important to have accurate data which documents the numbers and motivates better policy; The NPE (troll) Litigation Database is a move towards that and it's free to access/use



  16. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 3: “Ein kritikwürdiges Unternehmen”

    A brief account of some further controversies in which the Kötter Group has been involved and its strained relations with German trade unions such as Verdi



  17. EPO Had a Leakage Problem and Privacy of Stakeholders Was Compromised, Affecting at Least 100 Cases

    The confidentiality principle was compromised at the EPO and stakeholders weren't told about it (there was a coverup)



  18. Links 15/5/2019: More Linux Patches and More Known Intel Bugs

    Links for the day



  19. False Hope for Patent Maximalists and Litigation Zealots

    Patent litigation predators in the United States, along with Team UPC in Europe, are trying to manufacture optimistic predictions; a quick and rather shallow critical analysis reveals their lies and distortions



  20. The Race to the Bottom of Patent Quality at the EPO

    The EPO has become more like a rubber-stamper than a patent office — a fact that worries senior staff who witnessed this gradual and troublesome transition (from quality to raw quantity)



  21. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 2: Meet the Kötters

    An introduction to the Kötter Group, the private security conglomerate which is lined up for the award of a juicy EUR 30 million contract for the provision of security services at the EPO



  22. Links 14/5/2019: Red Hat Satellite 6.5, NVIDIA 430.14 Linux Driver and New Security Bug (MDS)

    Links for the day



  23. Links 14/5/2019: GNU/Linux in Kerala, DXVK 1.2, KDE Frameworks 5.58.0 Released

    Links for the day



  24. Q2 Midterm Weather Forecast for EPOnia, Part 1: Urgent Shitstorm Alert

    Experts at the European Patent Office's (EPO) weather observation station have just issued an urgent alert warning about a major shitstorm looming on the horizon



  25. Patents That Were Gleefully Granted by the EPO Continue to Perish in Courts

    The decreasing quality of granted European Patents already becomes a growing problem if not a crisis of uncertainty



  26. Links 13/5/2019: ExTiX 19.5 and GNU Radio Conference 2019

    Links for the day



  27. The Microsoft Guide to the Open Source Galaxy

    Thou shalt not...



  28. Microsoft Would Kill the Goose for Money

    Microsoft is just 'monetising' Open Source by using it as 'bait' for Microsoft's proprietary software; those who we might expect to antagonise this have effectively been bribed by Microsoft



  29. Links 13/5/2019: Nanonote 1.2.0, OpenMandriva Lx 4.0 RC, and GNUnet 0.11.4

    Links for the day



  30. Professionally Incompetent EPO Management

    The EPO remains an awful employer, with top-level management largely responsible for the loss of talent and even money


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts