<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista 7 Less Secure Than Predecessors? Remote BSoD Now Possible!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73293</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73293</guid>
		<description>Ars Technica reports that MS has issued a security advisory concerning this issue, saying 7 is not affected:
http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/new-flaw-can-remotely-crash-windows-vista-and-windows-7.ars</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ars Technica reports that MS has issued a security advisory concerning this issue, saying 7 is not affected:<br />
<a href="http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/new-flaw-can-remotely-crash-windows-vista-and-windows-7.ars" rel="nofollow">http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/09/new-flaw-can-remotely-crash-windows-vista-and-windows-7.ars</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73264</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73264</guid>
		<description>7 have many modifications to the Vista codebase. But yes indeed there is indeed many similarities to Vista in 7, certainly more similarities than Vista was compared to XP. Not that this makes Vista/7 bad IMO, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7 have many modifications to the Vista codebase. But yes indeed there is indeed many similarities to Vista in 7, certainly more similarities than Vista was compared to XP. Not that this makes Vista/7 bad IMO, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73263</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73263</guid>
		<description>Underneath, however, the same codebase is more or less shared. It&#039;s not about this one flaw in particular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underneath, however, the same codebase is more or less shared. It&#8217;s not about this one flaw in particular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73256</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73256</guid>
		<description>I would not go that far, but yes there are indeed many similarities between Vista and 7. In this case, the key similarity is that they both support SMB 2.0, which was a new version of the SMB protocol introduced with Vista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not go that far, but yes there are indeed many similarities between Vista and 7. In this case, the key similarity is that they both support SMB 2.0, which was a new version of the SMB protocol introduced with Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73254</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73254</guid>
		<description>Those two are very similar. Underneath they are virtually the same and the above proves it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those two are very similar. Underneath they are virtually the same and the above proves it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73252</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73252</guid>
		<description>It is Vista/7, not &quot;Vista 7&quot;. This probably got confused by the fact that BN calls 7 &quot;Vista 7&quot;, which can easily be confused with &quot;Vista/7&quot; which is different. I don&#039;t use this name myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is Vista/7, not &#8220;Vista 7&#8243;. This probably got confused by the fact that BN calls 7 &#8220;Vista 7&#8243;, which can easily be confused with &#8220;Vista/7&#8243; which is different. I don&#8217;t use this name myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/08/vista-and-vista-7-bsod/comment-page-1/#comment-73242</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=17963#comment-73242</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted this at Slashdot - please &lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/submission/1068401/Windows-7-reintroduces-remote-BSoD&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;vote it up&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted this at Slashdot &#8211; please <a href="http://slashdot.org/submission/1068401/Windows-7-reintroduces-remote-BSoD" rel="nofollow">vote it up</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

