<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patents Roundup: IBM Abuse Carries On, Patent Troll Tracker on Trial, Paltalk Bites Again, and Patent Law Challenged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/09/19/ibm-problem-at-the-uspto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/19/ibm-problem-at-the-uspto/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/19/ibm-problem-at-the-uspto/comment-page-1/#comment-73510</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=18571#comment-73510</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Actually, what the linked Tim Lee article argues is that using the Coase Theorem to argue that a more efficient patent system would not benefit development. I’m not sure how you’d go straight from the Coase Theorem to making an argument that patents harm development.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I think it&#039;s a similar way or presenting the same conclusions, but yours is more precise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Actually, what the linked Tim Lee article argues is that using the Coase Theorem to argue that a more efficient patent system would not benefit development. I’m not sure how you’d go straight from the Coase Theorem to making an argument that patents harm development.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a similar way or presenting the same conclusions, but yours is more precise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aeshna23</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/09/19/ibm-problem-at-the-uspto/comment-page-1/#comment-73509</link>
		<dc:creator>aeshna23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=18571#comment-73509</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As Tim Lee stresses with the backing of the Coase Theorem, patents harm development.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually, what the linked Tim Lee article argues is that using the Coase Theorem to argue that a more efficient patent system would not benefit development.  I&#039;m not sure how you&#039;d go straight from the Coase Theorem to making an argument that patents harm development.  

http://timothyblee.com/?p=781 may be of more interest to BoycottNovell readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As Tim Lee stresses with the backing of the Coase Theorem, patents harm development.</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually, what the linked Tim Lee article argues is that using the Coase Theorem to argue that a more efficient patent system would not benefit development.  I&#8217;m not sure how you&#8217;d go straight from the Coase Theorem to making an argument that patents harm development.  </p>
<p><a href="http://timothyblee.com/?p=781" rel="nofollow">http://timothyblee.com/?p=781</a> may be of more interest to BoycottNovell readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

