<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Microsoft Seems to be Patenting Stuff Like Crazy”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/</link>
	<description>Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-75845</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22239#comment-75845</guid>
		<description>&quot;&lt;em&gt;Microsoft needs to innovate above standard protocols&lt;/em&gt;&quot;

--Halloween Memo I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<em>Microsoft needs to innovate above standard protocols</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;Halloween Memo I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuhong Bao</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-75844</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuhong Bao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22239#comment-75844</guid>
		<description>&quot;One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and make the “ACPI” extensions somehow Windows specific.&quot;
MS did end up creating an ACPI WMI extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and make the “ACPI” extensions somehow Windows specific.&#8221;<br />
MS did end up creating an ACPI WMI extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-75821</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22239#comment-75821</guid>
		<description>This might be worth doing a Wiki page on. We don&#039;t have that yet.

See http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/Microsoft_-_Legal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be worth doing a Wiki page on. We don&#8217;t have that yet.</p>
<p>See <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/Microsoft_-_Legal" rel="nofollow">http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/Microsoft_-_Legal</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Needs Sunlight</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-75820</link>
		<dc:creator>Needs Sunlight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22239#comment-75820</guid>
		<description>M$ has always stolen from competitors.  

You might also point to the cases where M$ has already been using patents offensively to stifle competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M$ has always stolen from competitors.  </p>
<p>You might also point to the cases where M$ has already been using patents offensively to stifle competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-75814</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22239#comment-75814</guid>
		<description>Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;http://boycottnovell.com/2009/11/15/viral-microsoft-fud/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;may be using its GPL violations to spread FUD about the GPL&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft <a href="http://boycottnovell.com/2009/11/15/viral-microsoft-fud/" rel="nofollow">may be using its GPL violations to spread FUD about the GPL</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williami</title>
		<link>http://techrights.org/2009/11/20/software-patents-madness/comment-page-1/#comment-75802</link>
		<dc:creator>williami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boycottnovell.com/?p=22239#comment-75802</guid>
		<description>Wow. Micro$oft is in what I&#039;d like to call a &quot;Hyperactive Patent Mood&quot;. I mean, patenting free software tools like CRAZY!!!!!!!!! Hello, SFLC? I think we have a repeat GPL violator violating the GPL again, and this one&#039;s going to be real familiar to you... Hint: It&#039;s a very big company that makes windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Micro$oft is in what I&#8217;d like to call a &#8220;Hyperactive Patent Mood&#8221;. I mean, patenting free software tools like CRAZY!!!!!!!!! Hello, SFLC? I think we have a repeat GPL violator violating the GPL again, and this one&#8217;s going to be real familiar to you&#8230; Hint: It&#8217;s a very big company that makes windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

